My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1976 09 07
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1976 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1976 09 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:10 PM
Creation date
8/26/2009 11:03:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/7/1976
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1976 09 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />WOOD BROS. CONTID <br /> <br />Mr. Reiter stated that appraisals were <br />made on the lots with the knowledge of <br />the City Attorney. Re stated that he under- <br />stood that the City did not like to get <br />involved with condemnation however, Wood <br />Bros. felt that the price of the lot may <br />be three time higher then the worth if the <br />City does not consider condemnation. <br />Mr. Reiter stated that Wood Bros. is pre- <br />sently contemploating $25,000 to $30,000 <br />worth of work east of the subdivision <br />boundary which might not be normally re- <br />quired. <br />Re also stated that Wood Bros. can alter <br />their drainage to obtain the required de- <br />tention, without the two lots and without <br />constructing the improved facility under <br />Lincoln and Griffith. <br />Re stated that the two lots in question are <br />of minimal value because they are within <br />the flood plain. <br />Mr. Reiter noted that he received a letter <br />from the school district stating that <br />they were not in favor of the plat because <br />of increased drainage. <br />Mr. Reiter stated that because of the de- <br />tention, the plat creates less drainage. <br />Mr. Wurl read the letter from the school <br />district concerning the drainage proposal. <br /> <br />Councilman DelPizzo stated that he felt <br />the drainage has been increased in that <br />area. <br />Re also stated that he did not approve of <br />condemnation and felt that Wood Bros. <br />should try to compromise with the property <br />owners on the sale of their land. <br />Councilman McDonald questioned the letters <br />sent to the property owners. <br />Mr. Reiter stated that he had made offers <br />based upon inhouse appraisals of their <br />lot values and then increased it by a <br />certain percentage. Both parties re- <br />jected the offer. <br /> <br />Councilman Caranci asked what would happen <br />with the lots. <br />Mr. Reiter stated that the lots would be <br />dedicated to the City for park purposes. <br />Mr. White stated that he was satisfied <br />that less water would be dumped into the <br />area; and the only other alternative would <br />be to put the drainage under the street <br />they construct, and that would be quite <br />expensive. <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.