Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COLO. TECH. CENTER <br />CONT'D <br />PAT ROGERS <br /> <br />If I get this entire study, documentation and <br />all with a bow-tie within 2 weeks, which is <br />shorter than our usual turn-out time, the <br />State requires some things that we have to <br />do within 24 days, there will be a reply. <br />If you can ask me point by point questions <br />you will get a reply. <br /> <br />JIM KIRKS PHALEN <br /> <br />I would like a question answered. <br />Maybe somebody from the LUC can answer if for <br />me. I have listened to this presentation, <br />and I feel satisfied with it. Could someone <br />from the LUC please tell me what they want? <br /> <br />Maybe I should try to clarify what happened <br />at this point. If you were to go ahead on <br />the basis of this information designate <br />those in areas that Dr. Robinson has indi- <br />cated are subject to 1% or greater chance of <br />subsidence as a geologic hazard area, the map <br />and all the supporting documentation would <br />go to the LUC for review. They would schedule <br />it for a public hearing, end of June or July, <br />whenever the information came in. The LUC <br />at that time would want to hear from Dr. <br />Robinson and from the CGS; and to get the <br />geological's survey recommendation and opinion <br />on this study and whether it satifies in the <br />the survey's mind what should be designated <br />as a geologic hazard area. So, the tech- <br />nical determination, as far as the Commission <br />is concerned, would first come from the <br />geologic survey. It may be that you will want <br />to go ahead tonight and designate on this <br />basis and take a chance with the geologic <br />survey coming up with a different opinion be- <br />fore the LUC and the LUC weighing what Dr. <br />Robinson says what you have done and what the <br />geologic survey does. Beyond that I really <br />can't be more specific because I'm not a geo- <br />logist and I can't indicate what the potential <br />questions are concerns might be concerning <br />this study and this map. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN MC DONALD <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN MC DONALD <br /> <br />In other words there is really no guarantee <br />that this will stop even in July or August. <br />Is this right? <br /> <br />If at the end of this hearing tonight you <br />decide to go ahead and designate or not to <br />designate on the basis of this information <br />without first hearing the CGS opinions on it; <br />if you choose to go that way, then the LUC <br />as I say will hear from both sides and make <br /> <br />JIM KIRKSPHALEN <br /> <br />-17- <br />