My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Sustainability Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 06 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
SUSTAINABILITY ADVISORY BOARD
>
2023 Sustainability Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Sustainability Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2023 06 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2023 5:22:56 PM
Creation date
7/5/2023 4:00:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/21/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Sustainability Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />May 17, 2023 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />between two options, but does think it's reasonable to execute options 2 and 3 <br />simultaneously. <br />Tiffany asked if the City's EDI Manager will be involved with making sure there <br />are incentives for families and communities to make these transitions. Amelia <br />responded that this is on the City's radar. <br />Lev voiced his support for options 2 and 3 simultaneously and thinks redundancy <br />is good. He asked how the upper limits of the lumens were established and noted <br />that the lumens for commercial are much higher than residential. Amelia <br />responded that a 20,000 limit was initially considered since the initial ordinance <br />draft was meant to incorporate parking lots. However, the city planners will likely <br />create separate lumen limits for parking lot lighting and non -parking commercial <br />lighting. The residential lighting limit was based on limits from other programs <br />and the lumen levels of lights available online. <br />Todd asked about the budget impacts of this ordinance. He posed a question to <br />the board asking if the board believes this is the best use of City funds. Amelia <br />mentioned that it would be valuable for LSAB to state in the memo if the board <br />thinks this is a good use of City funds. He asked about an upstream approach to <br />put pressure on manufacturers and retailers to no longer sell noncompliant <br />lighting or to encourage the promotion of compliant lighting. Amelia responded <br />that a large number of people buy bulbs online, which makes it difficult to <br />accomplish dark sky goals solely through a retailer approach. <br />LSAB will decide in June what its memo about Dark Lighting should say. To <br />prepare for the meeting, LSAB members should review the Engage Louisville <br />website that contains information on how the ordinance has changed. LSAB's <br />memo can generally support the Dark Sky ordinance without recommending a <br />specific path, or we can choose to recommend a specific path. We can decide <br />whether to keep the current draft memo or update it during the June meeting. <br />Discussion Item — Solar United Neighbors <br />Kayla provided an overview of the communication tools currently used by the <br />Sustainability division. For more information about the sustainability <br />communication plan, view the May LSAB packet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.