Laserfiche WebLink
PART I: <br />ANALYSIS OF RESULTS <br />The analysis of data generated from the questionnaire has been divided into the following twelve <br />parts which correspond to the sections in the questionnaire having scaled questions: <br />PART 1 <br />PART 2 <br />PART 3 <br />PART 4 <br />PART 5 <br />PART 6 <br />PART 7 <br />PART 8 <br />PART 9 <br />PART 10 <br />PART 11 <br />PART 12 <br />LOUISVILLE PERFORMANCE (general) <br />LOUISVILLE PUBLIC SAFETY <br />LOUISVILLE PUBLIC WORKS <br />LOUISVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION <br />LOUISVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY <br />LOUISVILLE SERVICE PRIORITIES <br />LOUISVILLE POLICY PRIORITIES <br />LOUISVILLE TRANSPORTATION <br />LOUISVILLE GROWTH <br />LOUISVILLE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT <br />TYPE OF LOUISVILLE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT <br />TAKING ALL THINGS INTO CONSIDERATION <br />LOUISVILLE PERFORMANCE (general) <br />Part 1 (page 54) of the survey indicated a generally high degree of satisfaction with operations <br />and maintenance items. The rating of several public involvement -type items was somewhat <br />lower. The City received a very favorable rating in the sponsoring of community -wide events <br />(6.8). <br />Some variation was noted in response patterns for certain social -economic categories. For <br />instance, college graduates tended to rate the City higher, while non -college graduates rated it <br />lower on several items. Those respondents living in Louisville ten years or more consistently <br />rated the City lower than the pooled mean score for most items in Part 1. This is shown in the <br />following table: <br />15 <br />