Laserfiche WebLink
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />In the spring of 1994, 345 Louisville households responded to an eight -page community survey. <br />The survey asked people to rank questions and issues on a 9-point scale with one (1) generally <br />being low or unacceptable, and nine (9) being high or excellent. <br />Highlights of the results include: <br />Part 1: Louisville Performance. A score of 7.0 was given for City maintenance of its <br />facilities like City Hall, the Library, and the Recreation Center. <br />Part 2: Public Safety. Households responding to this survey ranked the general safety of <br />their neighborhood 7.3. <br />Part 3: Public Works. Very consistent rankings (6.4 to 6.8) were given for all ten <br />questions in this area. <br />Part 4: Parks and Recreation. Parks, ballfields, playgrounds, and trails all were ranked <br />high by households. <br />Part 5: Public Library. The lowest library score (5.7 for size) is being addressed by an <br />expansion project now underway. <br />Part 6: Service Priorities. Street drainage and alley work received low scores of 4.8 <br />while recycling and water conservation efforts scored highest at 6.8. <br />Part 7: Policy Priorities. A policy for locating public schools and buffer areas between <br />Louisville and its neighbors were most important here. <br />Part 8: Transportation. No rankings were in the top third of the scale, but some support <br />was seen for improving metro -area mass transit. <br />Part 9: Growth. Limits to the current growth is a top priority. <br />Part 10: Business Development. Lukewarm support for government involvement in <br />business development was expressed. <br />Part 11: 7ypes of Business. High-tech and research facilities were preferred if Louisville <br />sought to bring in new businesses. <br />Part 12: Overall Perception. With a score of 7.6 for personal safety and 7.5 for overall <br />quality of life, Louisville was seen as a quality community by these 345 <br />households. <br />1 <br />