My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2023 09 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2023 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2023 09 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2023 9:34:48 AM
Creation date
11/22/2023 9:31:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/20/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In the Old Town Overlay, LMC Section 17.12.050, setbacks are based on lot width. The <br />subject property has a lot width of approximately 61.04 feet at the rear and 60.63 feet at the <br />front. Therefore, the relevant setbacks from the property line for the detached garage are <br />as follows: <br />Street Side Yard Setback: 15 feet <br />Rear Yard Setback: 0 feet <br />PROPOSAL: <br />The requested variance would allow a second -story addition on the existing garage and a <br />setback from the property line abutting Main Street of 1.5 feet. <br />oo� <br />----------------------------------- <br />Existing elevation (top left) with proposed street -facing elevations and renderings (bottom). <br />REVIEW CRITERIA: <br />The Board of Adjustment has authority to grant or deny a variance request based on the <br />review criteria found in LMC Sec. 17.48.110. The following are staff's analysis of the criteria <br />with recommended findings on each. In reviewing an application, the Board must find that <br />all six variance criteria have been met. <br />That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions such as irregularity, <br />narrowness or shallowness of lot, or exceptional topographical or other physical <br />conditions peculiar to the affected property. <br />The subject property has an existing garage from the 1960s or earlier that was placed closer <br />to Main Street than current zoning allows. There are a number of these types of properties <br />in the surrounding area: corner lots with alley access that have older, street -facing garages <br />that do not meet setbacks. Given the presence of these other garages, the garage on the <br />subject property does not constitute a unique physical circumstance or condition. Staff finds <br />the proposal does not meet this criterion. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.