My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2023 09 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2023 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2023 09 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2023 9:34:48 AM
Creation date
11/22/2023 9:31:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/20/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 19, 2023 <br />Page 4 of 11 <br />Steve Sparhawk, DeckTec Outdoor Designs, Inc. <br />Sparhawk discusses how they meet the 20-foot setback. He believes this will <br />enhance the neighborhood as well as the property. <br />Applicant Questions of Staff. <br />None is heard. <br />Public Comment: <br />None is heard. <br />Closinq Statement by Applicant: <br />None is heard. <br />Closing Statement by Staff: <br />Stuart asks if there letters of support. <br />Hassan says there were a few and they are in the meeting packet. <br />Discussion b By oard: <br />Sommer wonders how reasonable and a minimum are computed. She discusses <br />the variance granted four years versus this current one. <br />Cooper says there are large sized homes along the golf course and they all have <br />garden views and large decks since there is so much golf course area. It does <br />not encroach at all for other properties or the golf course. In her perspective, <br />whether it is two or nine feet, it will look the same. <br />Hawksley agrees with Cooper and talks about the impossibility of having a deck <br />span the rear of the home without having this setback. <br />Sommer discusses the hardship criteria and how that is applied. <br />Cooper says she does not think people go into buying any home thinking about <br />zoning and code. They are evaluating what other neighbors have in the <br />neighborhood and assuming they could do the same to their property. <br />Stuart says it depends on how you define hardship. This property owner did not <br />create the lot line as it is. <br />Hawksley says as a City, we set setback criteria. Unfortunately, streets are not <br />straight and lots change shape. We factor in if the general rules or criteria then fit <br />in for this lot. <br />Sommer believes that owners cannot claim ignorance when buying a lot. She <br />asks for a scenario when this would not be allowed or a reasonable request to be <br />given. <br />Nakari says we did have a case about a year ago that had a deck that <br />encroached on the neighbor's property. We did not approve that case. This <br />proposal does not encroach on another property though. He believes this <br />proposal meets the spirit of the lot. <br />Cooper believes this is the most reasonable design that they could do in order to <br />conform to the neighborhood. <br />Sommer asks about precedent and judgment in regards to proposals. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.