My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 10 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2023 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 10 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2023 1:14:00 PM
Creation date
11/22/2023 10:29:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/12/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 10, 2023 <br />Page 9 of 14 <br />regulations. A full retrofit of a commercial parking lot with up to 100 parking spots might <br />be $76,000. A full retrofit of 28,000 sf office building exterior lights along with a parking <br />lot might be $119,000. A smaller strip mall might cost $8,000 for partial retrofit, not <br />including labor cost. Brackett Hogstad also provided an estimated breakdown by lighting <br />type: $50/soffit, $300/wall pack, $770/parking lot fixture. <br />Brackett Hogstad discussed rebate options. She has spoken to PACE but did not hear <br />back from Xcel. PACE rebates covered 50% of a $16,000 project, and they cap rebates <br />at $20,000. <br />Brackett Hogstad described the compliance and education options that would go along <br />with adopting Option 2 — mailers, store partnerships, programs, webpage, and <br />verification of lighting for all permits. She mentioned that a lighting review is not <br />currently required for residential permits, but a verification process on the permit could <br />help capture more lighting. Finally, Brackett Hogstad mentioned that creating and <br />enforcing a field compliance protocol would be difficult given the lack of comprehensive <br />mechanisms for measuring compliance in the field. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends Option 2, with changes presented today. Brackett Hogstad said that <br />this would allow for some properties to come into compliance over time, and that it <br />would be easier to administer and enforce. The proposed ordinance would be rolled out <br />more slowly, is relatively straightforward, and is tied into the building permit review <br />process. The option strikes a balance between potential cost and scale of development. <br />Brackett Hogstad says that all options will require new processes; though Option 2 <br />would be easier to enforce. Residents will need education no matter the option. <br />Regarding Option 3, Brackett Hogstad said that this does not capture community <br />feedback. <br />Commissioner Questions of Staff. - <br />Krantz asked for clarification about requirements and the use of deadlines; Brackett <br />Hogstad does not think a deadline for compliance will solve the problem of uptake <br />based on her review of other jurisdictions' use of amortization. <br />Howe asked if staff estimated the cost for the city to become compliant. Brackett <br />Hogstad responded that the City would need an outside consultant to create a specific <br />estimate for lighting on City properties. She has spoken with Facilities staff and thinks <br />there are quite a few lights already in compliance. <br />Krantz asked if streetlights are compliant except for spacing and pole height. Brackett <br />Hogstad does not know if they are compliant for this exact code and reminds the <br />City of Louisville <br />Community Development 749 Main Street Louisville CO 80027 <br />303. 335. 4592 www.LouisvilleCO.gov <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.