My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 10 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2023 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 10 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2023 1:14:00 PM
Creation date
11/22/2023 10:29:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
10/12/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 10, 2023 <br />Page 10 of 14 <br />Planning Commission that streetlights do not need to comply with the proposed <br />regulations. <br />Krantz asked about the cost of the ballfield retrofit for lighting. Zuccaro says $250,000 <br />and this includes lights and lighting systems. <br />Baskett recalled the original options and wonders where the other cities fell in relation <br />to our proposal. Brackett Hogstad says that other jurisdictions mostly employ use <br />changes, or development type as their compliance trigger. <br />Howe asked for clarity on the downtown exemption. Brackett Hogstad says the <br />downtown area is subject to brightness and color regulations and has tighter restrictions <br />on brightness but is exempt from trespass requirements. Brackett Hogstad mentions it <br />is difficult to identify the offending light in an area like downtown. The lower lumen max <br />is intended to help address the lack of trespass regulation. <br />Baskett is more comfortable with the downtown exemption with more understanding. <br />Public Comment: <br />Cindy Bedell, resident, commented that the Option 2 changes are a step in the right <br />direction, yet still thinks that there should be a requirement for existing homes. <br />Residential light trespass should be included in her opinion. Some of the new homes <br />south of Harper Lake have egregious lighting. Some modifications could be very simple, <br />motion detectors next to homes only and not on backlots, no use of flood lights <br />overnight. She thinks education will be important. She encourages the city to investigate <br />providing discounts and samples at local hardware stores. <br />Josh Cooperman, resident, is strong supporter of Dark Sky. He appreciates the work <br />staff has put into this. Responding to other public comments, he thinks that security <br />concerns are valid, but that has nothing to do with Dark Sky compliance. He thinks the <br />Ordinance will have little impact due to overall sky glow from surrounding communities, <br />but that it is still worthwhile. He thinks Louisville could set a positive example and that <br />creative ideas could be used. He makes one more plug for correlated color temperature <br />of the lighting. He mentions that Dark Sky International certifies lights up to 3,000 <br />kelvins. Dark Sky International would prefer under 2,200, but it is difficult to find such <br />lighting. He thinks 2,700 kelvins would be a good maximum, with a waiver option up to <br />3,000K, as a standard of 3,000K does not accomplish enough. Finally, regarding <br />compliance, the original intention at City Council was to pursue amortization on a <br />timeline of less than 10 years. That said, the Ordinance should reflect the community's <br />desires. He still prefers amortization because it is more stringent, but he supports <br />Option 2 as well. <br />John Webb, resident, spoke on behalf of the Bee City Committee and the insects. He <br />read a memo about the role night flyers play in pollination. Worldwide insect population <br />City of Louisville <br />Community Development 749 Main Street Louisville CO 80027 <br />303.335.4592 www.LouisvilleCO.gov <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.