My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 11 27
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2023 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2023 11 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/22/2023 1:23:09 PM
Creation date
11/22/2023 1:19:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
11/27/2023
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />Brackett Hogstad noted that it was one of very few Queen Anne style buildings in <br />Louisville, and it had links to the City's immigrant and mining history. All work noted in the <br />grant request was identified in the HSA, and the total was below the maximum amount. <br />The majority of the funds were for reimbursements for work completed in the last 5 years. <br />Staff Findings: <br />Staff found the property met both the Landmark and Grant criteria. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff recommended approval of Resolutions 6 and 7. <br />Commissioner Questions of Staff. <br />Beauchamp asked if it was typical to complete works before applying for grants. Brackett <br />Hogstad said that it was unusual and that applicants usually apply for the grants first. She <br />added that this was allowed, and that it had happened on occasion previously. <br />Haley noted that applying after completion may increase the chance of being fully <br />reimbursed. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />None was heard. <br />Question of Applicant: <br />None was heard. <br />Public Comment: <br />No additional public comment was heard. <br />Discussion by Commissioners: <br />Dalia was strongly in support of the application. <br />Burg noted that the property's design was unusual in Louisville. She said that was a great <br />candidate to become a landmark, given its architectural and social significance. She was <br />in support. <br />Haley said she believed it met the Landmark and Grant criteria. She noted that the <br />property won an award for the sensitive addition of the second roof gable. She was in <br />support. <br />Motion to approve Resolution 6 was moved by Dalia, seconded by Anderson. The <br />motion was adopted by a vote of 6 to 0. <br />Motion to approve Resolution 7 was moved by Dalia, seconded by Burg. The <br />motion was adopted by a vote of 6 to 0. <br />Probable Cause Public Hearing <br />Joe's Metal Shop <br />Brackett Hogstad presented the application for a request of $9k for the completion of a <br />Historic Structure Assessment. The structure was a pre-engineered metal building <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.