Laserfiche WebLink
<br />REGULAR MEETING <br /> <br />LOUISVILLE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 18, 1975 <br /> <br />Mayor Waschak called the meeting to order with the following Council <br />members present: Domenico, Berry, Caranci, Dhieux, DelPizzo, and <br />DiCarlo. Others present: City Administrator Wurl, City Attorney Morris, <br />City Engineer White, City Clerk Santilli. Absent: City Treasurer Hesson. <br /> <br />ACCEPTANCE OF MINUTES <br /> <br />Mayor Waschak and Council approved the <br />minutes as read. <br /> <br />COUNCIL ITEMS <br />LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWAL <br />FIRE DEPT. - SPECIAL LIC. <br /> <br />Councilman DelPizzo moved that the <br />special license for the fire department <br />be granted. Seconded by Councilman <br />Berry. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Councilman Domenico moved that the renewal <br />of Pasquales liquor license be granted. <br />Seconded by Councilman DelPizzo. Motion <br />carried. <br /> <br />PASQUALES <br /> <br />TWIN LIGHT INN <br /> <br />Councilman Domenico and DelPizzo stated <br />that they felt this license should not <br />be renewed. After discussion Councilman <br />Berry moved that the renewal of the <br />Twin Lights liquor license be granted. <br />Seconded by Councilman Caranci. Roll call. <br />Domenico no, Berry yes, Dhieux yes, <br />Caranci yes, DiCarlo yes, DelPizzo no. <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />WALDO'S <br /> <br />Councilman DiCarlo moved that the renewal <br />of Waldo.s liquor license be granted. <br />Seconded by Councilman Berry. Councilman <br />Domenico felt that there was too much <br />trouble at this establishment and that <br />the license should not be renewed. Coun- <br />cilman DelPizzo stated that he has had <br />complaints on the noise at this estab- <br />lishment and if they are to stay in <br />business then the police should be in- <br />structed to watch the area. After dis- <br />cussion roll call was taken on the issue. <br />Berry yes, Caranci yes, Dhieux yes, <br />DelPizzo no, Domenico no, DiCarlo yes. <br />Motion carried. <br />It was stated that the application was <br />in a different form. Mr. Wurl stated,: <br />that the reason for this was due to a <br />name change however the application was <br />in order. <br /> <br />-1- <br />