My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1975 09 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1975 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1975 09 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:09 PM
Creation date
9/8/2009 1:35:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
9/2/1975
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1975 09 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />HB 1041 - MATTERS OF STATE <br />INTEREST cont'd <br /> <br />Mr. Wur1 stated taht the Colorado Geological <br />Survey (CGS) was to have available in May <br />data that would tell what could be built on <br />different categories of severity. He stated <br />that the City has not received them yet. <br />Mr. Wur1 stated that he thought a more posi- <br />tive study was to be done on the area. <br /> <br />Mr. Dave Shelton stated that there were no <br />state standards at this time for construction <br />On areas with possible subsidence. He stated <br />that at this time it was up to the private <br />consultant to approach the problem in a way <br />he feels adequate and then the state would <br />work with him to review and give the local <br />governments a realistic idea as to whether it <br />is adequate. He stated that on costs, studies <br />such as Sproul were held. He stated that it <br />is difficult to prove without doubt that <br />subsidence will not occur. <br />Mr. Wur1 asked Mr. Shelton if the state accepted <br />Robinsons' report on Sproul. <br />Mr. Shelton stated there were a few reservations <br />on it but in general it was accepted. <br />Mr. Shelton stated that they have had meetings <br />to try to establish more detailed suggestions <br />as to subsidence and construction requirements. <br /> <br />Councilwoman Dhieux asked it is was feasible <br />to spend excessive amounts of money to <br />drill holes when there were people in the <br />City who worked the mines and could give de- <br />tailed reports on them. <br />Mr. Shelton stated that locating the mine is <br />just the beginning and that the big question <br />is whether or not subsidence will occur. <br />Councilman Domenico stated that he thought <br />after the closing of the mine it is shored up. <br />Mr. Shelton stated that after it is closed there <br />is a possibility of rotting and collapse. <br />Councilman Domenico stated that if the state <br />and county are so interested in the drilling <br />tests they should foot the expense to have <br />them done. <br />Mr. Billington, a nearby resident, stated that <br />he was unaware of any subsidence near Louisville. <br /> <br />Councilman DelPizzo stated that he could not <br />recall any great subsidence in or near <br />Louisville. <br /> <br />Mr. Marc DeMarco stated that he was a geologist <br />and property owner in Louisville. Mr. DeMarco <br />asked Mr. Shelton why the state classified a <br />portion of his property as being a subsidence <br />hazard when there is no mine there and the <br />state has not corrected their mistake in <br />designating this area as hazardous. <br /> <br />2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.