Laserfiche WebLink
<br />REGULAR MEETING <br /> <br />LOUISVILLE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 13, 1973 <br /> <br />FRONT RANGE DEVELOP- <br />MENT COUNCIL PROPOSAL <br /> <br />BRANDT CONTRACT <br /> <br />City Administrator Wurl then advised Council <br />a meeting had been scheduled for Thursday, even- <br />ing, November 15, 1973 at 7:00 p.m. at the City <br />Hall here in Louisville with the council members <br />of the cities involved, as well as Mr. Sparks. <br />In the interim we should be considering two as- <br />pects: <br />(1) <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />The Council's feelings as relates to <br />a district <br />We ought to be thinking about the number <br />of taps or number of people that we want <br />to serve from this project. <br />One of' the Key things is going to be our initial <br />allotment: . . Mr. vJurl then recommended <br />to go on record in an official meeting as to <br />Council's support of their proposal of a District. <br />After a thorough explanation of the entire program <br />by City Administrator Wurl and discussion of <br />Council - Councilman Jensen moved that Council <br />support the formation of the district with the <br />modified plan as presented by Rocky Mountain <br />Consultants, and that all parties concerned get <br />voting rights within the district itself. <br />Seconded by Councilman Deborski. Roll call vote <br />Domenico yes, Scholl yes, Donovan yes, Jensen <br />yes, King yes, Deborski yes. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Councilman Deborski moved that Council support <br />the Front Range Development Council proposal. <br />Seconded by Councilman King. All in favor. Mo- <br />tion carried. <br /> <br />City Administrator Wurl related to Council that <br />he had requested of Rocky Mountain Consultants, <br />and int~oduced Mr. Ken Rollen, to submit to us <br />a proposed contract that would be done in con- <br />junction with the City of Lafayette, and provide <br />us with the following items: <br />(1) Review our present circumstances and submit <br />recommendations as to what we ought to do <br />in the interim before Coal Creek is a reality. <br />Specifically review site locations for a <br />water treatment plant - the cost of which <br />will have to be borne by the cities seperate <br />from what the State is doing on the Dam and <br />the water rights acquisition. <br />(2) Update our present status. They would look <br />at what we are committed to now in the way <br />of additional taps and recommend some interim <br />propositions that we ought to consider. <br /> <br />Page - 2 - <br />