Laserfiche WebLink
<br />--;ULAR MEETING <br /> <br />LOUISVILLE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br />AUGUST 7, 1973 <br /> <br />E. Pool Bids Bathhouse bid from Architectural Bldg. <br />Systems in the amount of $59,534.00 received. Parks <br />& Recreation would like to have an "L" shaped pool. <br />Time schedule sixty days with 30 day provision if both <br />parties agree. Mr. Wurl stated we can't proceed <br />with the work pre-obtaining the Government Grant. <br />Councilman Donovan moved to follow Parks & Recreation <br />recormnendations and award the contract for the "L" <br />shaped pool to Tollefson, Inc. in the amount of $115, <br />434.00. Seconded bv Councilman Deborski. Roll call <br />vote - Deborski yes~ King yes, Donovan yes, Scholl yes. <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />F. Van Buskirk - Study Session set for August 13th <br />G. Industry - Study Session set for August 22nd <br />H. Park Dedication- Set for September 1st, 1973. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS: <br /> <br />Mayor Caranci asked about the status of the trash ac- <br />cross the tracks. Mr. Wurl stated he received appro- <br />val from the County to take the trash over to our land <br />and dump it. Cars will be hauled off. Councilman <br />King moved that all trash be removed by August 24th. <br />Seconded by Councilman Deborski. All in favor. Motion <br />carried. <br /> <br />Councilman Deborski made a recommendation that bath- <br />rooms be installed at the parks. Bathroom facilities <br />will be available as soon as swimming pool is finished. <br />Talked to Seevers about it and he was going to investi- <br />gate the idea of using San-o-let during the summer <br />months. <br /> <br />Councilman Donovan inquired what could be done about <br />the signs on the Carpet Shop. Mr. Wurl to take care <br />of it. <br /> <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR <br /> <br />A. Railroad Signal Re~ort. Met with Public Utili- <br />ties Commission and Rallroad representatives and dis- <br />cussed the signal. It was suggested that we re-eval- <br />uate the whole matter and come up with the estimate <br />as to the possibility of closing Griffith St. and open- <br />ing Lafayette St. We would consider this proposition. <br />Would say Lafayette is a wider street and not a dead <br />end, ties onto a major thoroughfare in that part of <br />town. Lafayette St. would become a thru street; will <br />have to fill in the east side. They would rather we <br />forget about crossings except South Boulder and Pine <br />St. <br /> <br />Page - 2 - <br />