My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 07 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 07 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:14 PM
Creation date
9/28/2009 10:31:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2009 07 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 15, 2009 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br />Koertje stated his interest in Senor T's. He requested that each request be <br />placed on the next agenda. <br /> <br />Tofte stated that 4 weeks is a long time to wait for an answer. <br /> <br />Lewis stated that just because a structure is on the market doesn't mean it is in <br />peril. <br /> <br />Stewart asked how much of the fund balance is avaialble for acquisition. <br /> <br />Koertje stated the fund has not been broken down into individual elements. <br /> <br />Stewart stated he would recommend the grain elevator as the first acquisition. <br />He stated it is not being used nor is it on the market. <br /> <br />Tofte asked if the Commission could move forward on acquiring something that <br />isn't currently on the market. <br /> <br />Stewart asked why not. <br /> <br />Tofet asked how should the Commission allocate funds. <br /> <br />Koertje stated the Commission will create a budget at the beginning of each year. <br /> <br />Koertje closed by asking Staff to bring back the grant application at the next <br />meeting for Commission review. <br /> <br />Update/Discussion/Action - Downtown Design Guidelines and Old Town <br />Overlay Regulations <br /> <br />Koertje stated Whiteman and Kortje had asked City Council to appoint a body to <br />review what elements of the downtown design standards should be reviewed. <br />Koertje stated that Council recommended that the HPC and Planning <br />Commission chose two representatives from each Commission to go through the <br />guidelines to determine what elements need to be addressed, primarily how to <br />address the preservation of character. <br /> <br />McCartney then polled the Commission to ask who would be interested in <br />participating. <br /> <br />Stewart and Williams volunteered to be on the review committee. <br /> <br />Tofte stated the Committee could contact Greg McMenemen to inquire about the <br />establishment of an architectural review board. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.