My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 07 20
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 07 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:14 PM
Creation date
9/28/2009 10:31:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2009 07 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 15, 2009 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br />Stewart stated that the grant can be re-applied for in 6 months. <br /> <br />Muckle asked if we should hire someone to review the grant application to see <br />why it might have been denied? <br /> <br />Lewis agreed that the Commission should have someone review it so the grant <br />request can be resurrected. <br /> <br />Williams asked if anyone knew how often a grant can be reapplied for and when <br />the next deadline is. <br /> <br />Stewart answered that the next deadline is September 1st. <br /> <br />Koertje stated that the alternative is to do this on our own without the SHF. <br /> <br />Tofte stated that the survey's need to be redone because there are several <br />mistakes. Tofte stated she would be interested in having an outside source <br />assist with the grant application to ensure it is filled out properly. She also <br />requested to see a copy of the grant application. <br /> <br />Koertje stated he will make copies of the grant application available to the <br />Commissioners. <br /> <br />Muckle stated it would be good for the Commissioners to have copies of the <br />survey. She also stated the social history's of each structure should be on the <br />City's website. <br /> <br />Lewis stated there should be a special website just for the HPC. <br /> <br />Muckle stated the public should be seeing all that we are seeing. Muckle then <br />inquired about the status of the GIS system. <br /> <br />McCartney answered there is a GIS Coordinator on staff and development of GIS <br />is moving forward. <br /> <br />Muckle inquired if the Commission received a grant for the 2000 Survey. <br /> <br />Tofte stated she thought there was a grant. <br /> <br />Koertje redirected the discussion back to the fund. He stated that the acquisition <br />element was a big deal but the Commission might not be ready for that element. <br /> <br />Muckle wondered if the City could consider the old hospital (on Jefferson) as a <br />potential acquisition. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.