My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2000 05 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2000-2009 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2000 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2000 05 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:01:58 PM
Creation date
10/1/2009 4:50:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
5/2/2000
Original Hardcopy Storage
5A6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2000 05 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Louisville City Council Meeting <br />April 18, 2000 <br />Page 8. <br /> <br />Sam Light, City Attorney read Ordinance No. 1337, Series 2000 - An Ordinance <br />Providing for An Alternate Member of the Louisville Citizens Open Space Advisory <br />Board. <br /> <br />MOTION: Brown moved that Council set Ordinance No. 1337, Series 2000 - An <br />Ordinance Providing for An Alternate Member of the Louisville Citizens Open Space <br />Advisory Board, out for publication and set the public hearing for May 2, 2000, seconded <br />by Sisko All in favor. <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br /> <br />Sam Light, City Attorney stated that his office had reviewed the State Statutes with <br />regard to the zoning regulation of charter schools. Light noted that Section 124 (C.R.S. <br />Section 22-32-124) addresses education and allows boards of education to find and <br />determine the location of public schools. A charter school is a public school, however, <br />nothing in the Statute suggests that the general assembly has given the powers in Section <br />124 to governing bodies of charter schools. Light stated that unlike the Board of <br />Education, a charter school, at this time, does not have the authority from the State <br />i legislature to preempt local zoning laws. <br /> <br />Light noted that another question, with regard to this issue, is whether boards of <br />education could delegate this power to the governing body of a Charter School. Light <br />stated that Mayor Davidson received a letter from Stan Garnett, President of the Boulder <br />Valley School District Board. Garnett stated it was his belief that nothing in the Peak to <br />Peak charter shows that power was delegated to the Peak to Peak School. Upon review <br />of the charter, Light stated it was his initial opinion that this power has not been <br />. delegated. Light noted that there is a question of whether that type of delegation, if even <br />made, is proper under constitutional law . Light stated that they are still in the process of <br />investigating that issue. <br /> <br />Light reviewed another question of whether the State Statute providing exceptions to <br />local zoning laws extends to property that is being leased for school purposes. Light <br />stated that Section 124 requires that a board of education, prior to acquisition of land, or a <br />contract for purchase must consult with and advise a city's planning commission, in order <br />that the proposed site conforms to the adopted plan of the community insofar as possible. <br /> <br />He noted that an additional requirement is that boards of education shall submit a site <br />development plan for review and comment, prior to any construction. Light stated that <br />the Statute extends to property owned or leased by boards of education. However, Light <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.