My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1998 12 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1998 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1998 12 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:01:57 PM
Creation date
10/21/2009 3:46:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
12/1/1998
Original Hardcopy Storage
5A2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1998 12 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />committee. He stated that limiting an office or retail building to twenty-nine feet would limit the <br />ceiling heights to eight or nine feet. He believes the ordinance will create a mololithic block in <br />downtown Louisville. He encouraged Council to review the proposed Downtown Design Guidelines <br />and the ordinance as it was originally presented by staff and consider some alternatives to the current <br />ordinance presented tonight. <br /> <br />Max Barber, 732 Main Street, Louisville, Colorado, stated that the proposed Downtown Design <br />Guidelines do not allow for any three-story structures on the street scape. It allows for a three-story <br />structure that is not within sight of the street. He questioned the need for this ordinance when the <br />same standard has been set in the Downton Design Guidelines. <br /> <br />Davidson closed the public hearing and called for Council comments and questions. <br /> <br />Davidson stated that the ordinance is not intended to exclude three-story buildings. It is intended to <br />limit the density to prevent increasing traffic on Main Street beyond its current capacity. <br /> <br />, . <br /> <br />Sisk explained that he proposed this ordinance due to use-by-right concerns for downtown. He <br />believes this ordinance would challenge architects to be creative in their proposals for downtown." <br />He believes this solution is preferable to having a string of three-story buildings downtown that <br />would create traffic and parking problems. <br /> <br />Howard stated that he would support tins ordinance to prevent the traffic and parking problems that <br />downtown Boulder is facing. <br /> <br />Levihn stated that he would not support this ordinance if it did not allow for a three-story structure <br />downtown. He does not believe three-story structures are appropriate along Main Street but they <br />might be appropriate in other areas downtown. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that he would prefer that Council place a moratorium on building downtown until they <br />can carefully consider what would be acceptable in downtown Louisville. He compared this action <br />to a piecemealing rezone that leaves everyone wondering exactly what is and what is not acceptable. <br /> <br />Sisk moved that Council adopt Ordinance No. 1286, Series 1998 - An Ordinance Amending the <br />Louisville Municipal Code Setting a Maximum Building Height within the Old Town Commercial <br />Community District on second and final reading, seconded by Howard. <br /> <br />Sisk moved that Council amend Ordinance No. 1286, Series 1998 - An Ordinance Amending the <br />Louisville Municipal Code Setting a Maximum Building Height within the Old Town Commercial <br />Community District as delineated, seconded by Howard. <br /> <br />Sam Light, City Attorney, stated that footnote #10 on page 2 of Ordinance No. 1286, Series 1998 <br />contains the COITect description of th~: district affected by the Ordinance. The description used in the <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.