My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1998 12 01
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1998 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1998 12 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:01:57 PM
Creation date
10/21/2009 3:46:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
12/1/1998
Original Hardcopy Storage
5A2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1998 12 01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />space areas that are not being addressed. This ordinance states that in the downtown area the dead <br />space exemption does not apply. The current code uses gross floor area, which is everything within <br />the four walls except vent space. <br /> <br />Keany stated he: did not believe that it is appropriate to include pedestrian friendly areas when <br />calculating the parking space requirement. He questioned how to address a current retail space that <br />changes to an office space in the future. He suggested placing a restriction in the PUDs for those <br />buildings that they can only be used for retail or restaurant or they are subject to the parking fee when <br />they change use. <br /> <br />Howard and Mayer agreed with Keany. <br /> <br />Sisk stated that Council has yet to address the more difficult issue of the fee per parking space. He <br />suggested that since it appears the cost for a parking space is $10,000, the amount of the parking <br />impact fee should be $5,000 per parking space. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that he agrees with Hartronft that a parking space should be guaranteed when paying <br />the parking impact fee. He expressed concern that the parking permit fee would create problems. He <br />predicted that as development increases downtown, more and more residential areas will insist on <br />a residential permit program. This will create more pressure to obtain permits for employees. <br />Businesses that did not have to pay for their employees to park would then be forced to do so. He <br />stated that land values downtown have increased approximately 70% over the last five years, <br />indicating downtown is vibrant. He did not believe the City should be involved in the parking issue <br />and would prefer that downtown business owners resolve the problem. <br />~ <br /> <br />Howard stated that historically the City has provided parking for restaurant and retail customers <br />downtown and that practice should continue. He believes the cost for additional parking should be <br />shared equally by the City and the property owner expanding their business. <br /> <br />Keany agreed with Sisk that the parking impact fee should be $5,000 per parking space. He <br />expressed support for both the parking permit fee and the parking impact fee. <br /> <br />Davidson agreed that the City has had an unwritten policy to provide parking for downtown retail <br />customers for many years. He stated that in order to guarantee business owners a parking space, it <br />would be necessary to charge them for the entire cost of $1 0,832 to provide that space. He stated that <br />there are many factors and assumptions to consider when determining the parking impact fee. He did <br />not believe using land valued at $17/sfwas the most cost-effective use of that land. He suggested <br />using land valued at $10/sf, which would bring the cost per parking space to $7,682. That would <br />result in a charge of approximately $3,800 per parking space and a less expensive parking permit. <br /> <br />Howard stated that he believes the cost is closer to $8,000 and suggested using the round figure of <br />$4,000 per parking space. <br /> <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.