My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 09 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 09 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:14 PM
Creation date
10/28/2009 12:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2009 09 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 20, 2009 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br /> <br />for sunlight. King then questioned whether the existing structure was worthy of <br />retention, stating it would take a lot to maintain the original structure. Kings <br />primary comment was he wanted his southern exposure and sunlight maintained. <br /> <br />Seeing no other public members wishing to speak, Whiteman closed the public <br />hearing at 7:25 p.m. <br /> <br />Commission Questions: <br />Muckle asked Johnson if he was able to check in the attic to find the exact <br />location of the original structure. <br /> <br />Johnson said he was not able to do that. <br /> <br />Muckle asked Johnson where he believed the origina <br /> <br />Johnson stated he believed it was located in the s <br /> <br /> <br />rner of the property. <br />were still there. <br /> <br />Stewart asked if the openings for the original <br /> <br />Johnson stated it is hard to determine due <br />would need to do more investigative res <br />where the openings were. <br /> <br />Stewart asked if Johnson anticipated placing <br />the garage is. <br /> <br />Johnson stated they haven't finah <br />be relocated somewhere to the we <br /> <br />Muckle stated if the <br />view it from the str <br /> <br />Johnson stated <br />structure in plac , <br />for the str to <br /> <br />designs to keep the existing <br />n successful in finding a function <br /> <br />doing to determine where the old structure is <br /> <br />g the material down to the studs. <br /> <br />Lewis sta probably pretty similar to the design of the two existing <br />miners cabi Id Town. Lewis recommended Johnson use those <br />existing cabin ral idea of design. <br /> <br />Johnson stated a the only merit of this structure. He believes that all of the <br />historic elements of the original structure might be gone. Johnson did state they <br />would be more than happy to use photos or existing architectural examples to <br />recreate the structure. <br /> <br />Muckle stated an old photo of the Acme Mine might have this structure located in <br />the background. <br /> <br />Lewis stated she had a copy of the image and would provide a copy to Johnson. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.