My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 09 21
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 09 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:14 PM
Creation date
10/28/2009 12:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2009 09 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 20, 2009 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />Lewis then asked the Commission if there could be a condition placed on the <br />approval to allow for a soft strip of the structure to uncover the historic buildings. <br /> <br />Whiteman asked what the intended development schedule of the project was. <br /> <br />Johnson stated he would like to move forward with design and have construction <br />in fall. <br /> <br />Williams asked Johnson what type of footprint will be designed for the new <br />structure. <br /> <br />Johnson stated he will be designing a modest 2,400 squar <br />will comply with the Old Town Overlay District regulation <br /> <br />Williams asked if the structure would be two-story. <br /> <br />Johnson answered in the affirmative and stated t <br />stepped back. <br /> <br />Williams asked if the basement will be pre <br /> <br />Johnson stated the existing house is ac <br />need to be moved to comply with the old t <br /> <br />Muckle asked if the basement w <br /> <br />would <br /> <br />Johnson said it was newer than <br />around mid 20th century. <br /> <br />Whiteman asked if the <br />preservation. Whit <br />in a street side d <br /> <br />Johnson said it <br />would not like to b <br /> <br />but was probably built <br /> <br />uld be considered <br />to maintain the structure <br /> <br />the street side appearance but he <br />amage it. <br /> <br />Lewis state <br />this structure <br />incentives. <br /> <br />Koertje stated the HPC can only review structures that are over 50 years old. <br /> <br />Lewis asked staff if the additions could be removed without a permit. <br /> <br />McCartney stated they would need a permit for the demolition because staff <br />needs to make sure gas and water are properly disconnected. <br /> <br />Stewart asked if Staff would have any problem with the land marking and <br />Certificate of Appropriateness running parallel. <br /> <br />McCartney answered staff would have no problems. <br /> <br />re than 50% of the historic materials would not qualify <br />rk. Lewis then asked if additions qualified for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.