Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 09 21

Home Browse Search

Historic Preservation Commission Meeting Minutes July 20, 2009 Page 5 of 9 Johnson stated he believed the structure actually would not qualify for landmarking due to all of the historical materials that have already been removed. Koertje stated this structure mayor may not qualify. Whiteman asked staff if the City could allow for partial demos. Whiteman also asked if the staff would be monitoring the demolition phases. McCartney stated a partial demo could be released and stated staff would be on site during the partial demo. Williams asked the Commission if they felt the building a contributing structure if all of the historical elements Stewart stated this was not a landmark hearing. recommend a stay on the structure with a parti strip to determine the significance of the stru Lewis agreed. Whiteman reminded the Commission an months. still be considered moved. ed he would to allow a soft 6 Koertje stated the stay could b back. ip and come back to Commission Disc Stewart stated elements that ar Lewis agr Koert" se partial demo permit to demo those a conditional release. mmission should apply the land marking criteria to White Koertje f understanding of the landmarking criteria. He stated the original riginallocation, but there aren't many historical materials rem as a strong social history but there aren't any archaeological c rations. Lewis agreed with Koertje's determination. Muckle stated she had trouble with the lack or architectural integrity, but also stated that there wasn't enough evidence to make the call. Muckle stated she was impressed with the applicants being so open, but believed the structure would not be considered for locallandmarking if it were relocated. City Council makes the final determination. Williams asked staff if the applicants could receive a variance on setbacks if the historical structure were left in place.