My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1997 06 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1997 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1997 06 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:01:55 PM
Creation date
11/13/2009 11:21:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
6/17/1997
Original Hardcopy Storage
5A1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1997 06 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
intensive landscaping.' On open space, he felt the 12% requirement was clear. He stated that they <br />would be enhancing the Hwy. 42 frontage to create a gateway entrance as you come from the east. <br />Davidson called for Council comments and questions. <br />Mayer asked what they felt their fair share of paving 104th Street would be. <br />Bellock stated that they felt there would be a two -lane road required and their fair share would be the <br />half that is adjacent to their property. There are two halves (quarters) to the other half: 1) represents <br />the Meisel property (150 acres), all the land south of Cherry Street; 2) intergovernmental property <br />north of Cherry Street. <br />Mayer wanted this looked into to come to a fair distribution of cost. He wanted to know the number <br />of employees they would have at buildout. <br />Etkin thought about 1,000 employees. <br />Mayer was concerned about along Hwy. 42: 1) working out the open space issue; 2) and enough) <br />buffer, about 50' from a big building from Hwy. 42 and the landscaping along their. <br />Levihn's concerns were open space, design guidelines, and roads. <br />Howard was concerned about the low water pressure and how they would handle the water <br />requirements at CTC. <br />Bellock stated that the District will be dealing with the water issue. <br />Davidson asked what kind of development they anticipated doing within the CB zoning? <br />Etkin anticipated office buildings with day care on the corner of Hwy 42 and 104th Street, <br />convenience and food services, normal amenities in an office park. <br />Davidson stated that the open space issue is resolvable, the traffic issue needed to be resolved (a <br />single developer would not be held responsible for all the traffic flowing down 104th Street), and <br />specific design guidelines for the parcel needed to be work out that would not be a variable (leave <br />this to staff and Planning Commission to work out). He looked at the project favorably, feeling it was <br />a substantial upgrade to what is there. <br />Sisk felt there should be three points of access to CTC: Hwy. 42, Dillon, and 104th Street. <br />Bellock pointed out that it would be impossible to market the property without knowing that it would <br />be allowed as an office use. He stated the options would be to get Council to agree that there would <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.