My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2009 08 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2009 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2009 08 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:19 AM
Creation date
11/19/2009 1:06:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2009 08 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />AUGUST 13, 2009 <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />Lipton asked why Bay 4 had a number above it when the others do not have a <br />number. <br />Callahan stated the number would be removed in the next set of plans. <br />Loo requested additional information about training days, time, and etc. <br />Parker stated the trainings are typically held any day during the week, with the <br />majority held on weekends. Attendance ranges from 5 to 25 individuals with <br />seating space available for 75 people. He confirmed there had been no parking <br />problems in the past. <br />Russell discussed with Callahan the northwest corner of the building. He <br />suggested additional landscaping to soften the wall. <br />Callahan stated the final landscape design of that corner is not complete but one <br />element to be included is the bell that is on the lot at this time. <br />Pritchard suggested the fire district logo be enlarged and placed on the wall. <br />Callahan agreed that is a possibility. <br />Members of the Public: <br />None heard. <br />Staff and Applicant Summary and Recommendation: <br />No additional comments from either staff or the applicant. <br />Public Hearing Closed Commission Comments: <br />Pritchard stated he supports the project. He also stated Condition #1 (parking <br />agreement) is not needed based on the discussion this evening. <br />Lipton stated he also supports the project. He requested the addition of two <br />conditions: 1) applicant should redesign the NW façade with either more interest <br />details or landscaping and 2) applicant should remove the number 4 from above <br />Bay 4. <br />Loo stated her support of the project. She also supports the removal of Condition <br />#1 regarding the parking agreement. She requested a condition be added stating <br />the SRU is for this applicant only. <br />Hartman stated her support and agrees with the new conditions and the removal <br />of the parking condition. <br />Russell stated he had nothing new to add. <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Lipton moved and Loo seconded a motion to approve Resolution No. 7, Series <br />2009 with the following changes to the conditions: <br />1) Remove the proposed staff Condition #1. <br />2) Re-number the other two staff conditions. <br />3) Add a condition “Applicant shall redesign the NW wall to add interest.” <br />4) Add a condition: “Applicant shall remove the number 4 from above Bay 4.” <br />5) Add a condition: “The SRU approval is for this applicant only.” <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.