My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2009 08 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2009 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2009 08 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:55:19 AM
Creation date
11/19/2009 1:06:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCMIN 2009 08 13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />AUGUST 13, 2009 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />Russell offered a friendly amendment to the condition regarding the NW wall. He <br />suggested “Applicant shall redesign the NW wall to add interest either with <br />design features or landscaping.” <br />Lipton and Loo accepted the friendly amendment. <br />Name Vote <br />Jeff Lipton Yes <br />Chris Pritchard Yes <br />Susan S. Loo Yes <br />Gail Hartman Yes <br />Monica Sheets Absent <br />Cary Tengler Absent <br />Scott Russell Yes <br />Motion passed: 5 to 0 <br /> <br /> Resolution No. 08, Series 2009, Urban Agriculture: Beekeeping: <br /> <br />A resolution recommending an amendment of the Louisville <br /> <br />Municipal Code allowing Beekeeping in residential zoned areas. <br />Public Notice Certification: <br />Continued business item from the July 9, 2009 meeting to date specific. No new <br />notice required. <br />Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: <br />None heard. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br /> McCartney summarized with the following points: <br />The ordinance has been edited to reflect the requested changes from the <br /> <br /> <br />previous meeting by the Commissioners. <br />The ordinance has also been reviewed by the City Attorney. <br /> <br /> <br />McCartney suggested discussion by the Commissioners to review the ordinance <br />for additional changes. <br />Russell, Hartman, Loo and Pritchard stated they had no questions or changes at <br />this time. <br />Lipton had questions about the Property-Owner vs. Beekeeper. Does it mean <br />that the property-owner can lease his backyard to a beekeeper? He also <br />questioned the license requirement and the notification process. <br />NOTE: Tengler arrived at 7:35 PM <br />Russell stated the 500’ notice requirements seems excessive. He proposed a 30- <br />day sign on the property. <br />Pritchard recommended a 100’ notice requirement. <br />Hartman and Loo agreed that posting the property makes sense. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.