My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 11 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2009 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 11 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:49:45 AM
Creation date
11/23/2009 10:42:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2009 11 12
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
iitntin1t v n Louisville Framework Plan <br />Parking <br />Existing Conditions <br />In summer 1997, City Staff conducted a parking <br />space inventory and utilization study (appendix C). <br />From this study, it was determined that there were <br />853 parking spaces in the study area. The study area <br />included the area east of the railroad tracks. Of this <br />total, 343 spaces were in private parking tots or were <br />private spaces accessed off of alleys and 510 spaces <br />were in public lots or on- street. At the time of this <br />study, peak parking demand was approximately 70 <br />percent of capacity. <br />In late 1998, City Staff conducted a parking usage <br />survey to determine downtown parking turnover. <br />Thirty -one percent of the public parking supply was <br />devoted to long -term parking. Based on the results <br />from long -term parking in public parking spaces, the <br />survey qualitatively estimated that 57 percent of <br />public and private parking supply downtown was <br />used for long -term parking. Vehicles parking for one <br />hour constituted 8 percent of the public parking sup- <br />ply. Generally, frequent parking turnover occurred <br />on Main and Spruce Streets and the Library park- <br />ing lot, with more long -term parking occurring on <br />the other east -west streets, Front Street and public <br />parking lots. <br />The fact that public lots are centrally located is an <br />asset to downtown. Prior to June 1997, City park- <br />ing code exempted properties in the Central Busi- <br />ness District (the area of downtown between South <br />Street, the railroad tracks, Elm Street and the alley <br />west of Main Street) from meeting off street park- <br />ing requirements. Loading spaces were required. <br />While there was no formal parking requirement prior <br />to June 1997, many sites did and continue to pro- <br />vide some of their own parking. Prior to implement- <br />ing parking requirements downtown, existing private <br />parking spaces were vulnerable to elimination as <br />some buildings were expanded. In June 1997, the <br />City adopted the Commercial Development Design <br />Standards and Guidelines (CDDSG). Parking re- <br />quirements in that document are presently applicable <br />to downtown. However these requirements were <br />adopted as an interim measure, with the intent to <br />allow time to implement parking requirements <br />unique to serving downtown needs. <br />20 <br />Projections <br />Based on the previously referenced parking study, <br />City Staff' estimated existing parking demand gen- <br />eration to project future parking demand based on <br />various downtown build -out scenarios. A parking <br />demand generation rate of 2.5 spaces per 1,000 gross <br />square feet of building area was arrived at based upon <br />this study. It is important to note that as develop- <br />ment increases, presently available parking supply <br />will inevitably be far exceeded by future parking de- <br />mand as development increases downtown. <br />Issues <br />Participants in the public workshops identified park- <br />ing as a major issue. One significant concern is the <br />shrinking supply of available parking as downtown <br />development increases. This is caused both by the <br />lass of private parking spaces and the increase in <br />parking demand. Participants indicated that down- <br />town employees are not using lots, rather they are <br />parking in customer oriented, on- street public park- <br />ing close to their place of employment. Concern is <br />that employee parking takes away from short term <br />customer parking. Therefore, parking management <br />is presently as much of an issue as supply. Although <br />providing adequate parking is a major concern, it is <br />clear that participants want parking to be subordi- <br />nate to the overall downtown vision, which is pe- <br />destrian-oriented. <br />While on -site parking provides for some of the park- <br />ing demand generated downtown, existing develop- <br />ment patterns may cause difficulties for expansion <br />plans in some situations. Present parking require- <br />ments do not permit the flexibility that some prop- <br />erty and business owners may need in providing <br />parking, such as providing required parking ofd site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.