My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 08 17 CANCELLED
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 08 17 CANCELLED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:14 PM
Creation date
11/25/2009 2:27:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2009 08 17 CANCELED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Muckle stated if the hi <br />view it from the str <br />Johnson stated <br />structure in place; h€ <br />for the structure to b <br />Stewart asked if Johnson anticipated placing th <br />the garage is. <br />Johnson stated they haven't finali <br />be relocated somewhere to the w <br />Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 20, 2009 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />for sunlight. King then questioned whether the existing structure was worthy of <br />retention, stating it would take a lot to maintain the original structure. Kings <br />primary comment was he wanted his southern exposure and sunlight maintained. <br />Seeing no other public members wishing to speak, Whiteman closed the public <br />hearing at 7:25 p.m. <br />Commission Questions: <br />Muckle asked Johnson if he was able to check in the attic to find the exact <br />location of the original structure. <br />Johnson said he was not able to do that. <br />Muckle asked Johnson where he believed the original structure was. <br />Johnson stated he believed it was located in the southeaorner of the property. <br />Stewart asked if the openings for the original doors and windows were still there. <br />Johnson stated it is hard to determine due to the many layers Aiding. He <br />would need to do more investigative research (soft dermolitien) to determine <br />where the openings were. <br />sting structure behind where <br />but the historic structure would <br />e reloc ted then no one could <br />designs to keep the existing <br />en successful in finding a function <br />Lewis asked wl1' t Johns ois doing to determine where the old structure is <br />compared to the new,truc <br />Johnson stated he will be removing the material down to the studs. <br />Lewis stated the design is probably pretty similar to the design of the two existing <br />miners cabins located in Old Town. Lewis recommended Johnson use those <br />existing cabins for a general idea of design. <br />Johnson stated age is the only merit of this structure. He believes that all of the <br />historic elements of the original structure might be gone. Johnson did state they <br />would be more than happy to use photos or existing architectural examples to <br />recreate the structure. <br />Muckle stated an old photo of the Acme Mine might have this structure located in <br />the background. <br />Lewis stated she had a copy of the image and would provide a copy to Johnson. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.