My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2009 09 16
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2001-2019 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2009 09 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:25:31 PM
Creation date
11/30/2009 11:32:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOAPKT 2009 09 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
McMillan <br />1. <br />Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 15, 2009 <br />Page 9 of 12 <br />o Staff informed them that the deck was built within the required setbacks <br />and stated that they would need to either remove the encroaching <br />elements of the deck or apply for a variance. <br />continued with a discussion of the Six (6) Variance Criteria as follows: <br />That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions such as <br />irregularity, narrowness or shallowness of lot, or exceptional topographical or <br />other physical conditions peculiar to the affected property. <br />• 100 feet deep <br />• 75 feet wide <br />• 7,500 square foot lot <br />• Property slopes from front to back, so topography is an issue <br />• Criterion has been met <br />2. That the unusual circumstances or conditions do not exist throughout the <br />neighborhood or district in which the property is located. <br />• Similar to other lots in Ponderosa <br />• No unusual circumstances or conditions <br />• Criterion not met <br />3. That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, the property <br />cannot reasonably be deepped in conformity with the provisions of Title 17 <br />of the Louisville Munici <br />• Property does need <br />the deck. This is cone <br />• Criterion has, been me <br />4. That such unnecessary hardsh' <br />• The unusual topography <br />• Criterion has been met <br />5. That the variance, if granted, will n <br />neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or <br />permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property. <br />• The rear of the property faces open space <br />• Approval of this deck will not impair the neighbor to the east and they <br />have approved the location <br />The request does not alter the essential character of the neighborhood <br />Criterion es been met <br />6. That t variant , if granted, is the minimum variance that will afford relief <br />and is the Jest modification possible of the provisions of Title 17 of the <br />Louisville Municipal Code that is in question. <br />• This is the minimum requirement needed for stairs to be constructed <br />• Could not have been relocated to require less relief <br />• Criterion has been met <br />second floor, so stairs are needed on <br />ical circumstance. <br />"'hot been"created by the applicant. <br />of the result of the applicant's action. <br />ter the essential character of the <br />McMillan reported the Staff findings do not meet all of the 6 criteria for approval and is <br />recommending denial of the requested variance. <br />Questions of Staff by the Board and Applicant: <br />Jasiak asked staff what minimum area is required for a stairway landing. <br />G:\MINUTES\Bd. Adj\2009\BOA.07.15.09.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.