My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 10 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2009 10 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:14 PM
Creation date
12/23/2009 9:50:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCPKT 2009 10 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 21, 2009 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />Koertje asked for a motion to continue this public hearing until October 19, 2009. <br />Muckle suggested a motion to continue the public hearing until October 19, 2009. <br />Tofte seconded the motion. It was unanimously approved. <br />Update/Discussion/Action - Programming of Historic Preservation Fund, <br />next steps <br />Koertje introduced this item to the public. <br />Connie Lawrence, owner of 561 Lincoln Avenue, stood and addressed the <br />Commission. Lawrence gave an update of the soft strip of the residence. <br />McCartney displayed photos of the project site by using PowerPoint on the over <br />head projectors. Lawrence used these photos in her description of how they <br />were progressing with the soft strip. Lawrence mentioned the following regarding <br />the project: <br /> The house was built without a foundation and the structural elements that <br />were sitting on the ground had become rotted. <br /> The architectural integrity had been compromised so much that the <br />structure would not survive any relocation. <br /> The whole west side of the historical house was missing because an <br />addition had been placed on the west side of the historical house, thereby <br />removing the original back wall. <br />Lawrence asked the Commission if the house could be completely demolished <br />based on the above findings. She noted that all efforts were made to preserve <br />the structure but there aren’t many historical elements remaining that can be <br />preserved. <br />Muckle asked Lawrence if there was much historical siding remaining under the <br />existing siding. <br />Lawrence answered there was approximately 50% of the historical siding <br />remaining. <br />McCartney stated the historical siding was being used as a structural element <br />being that there wasn’t any sheathing to provide the lateral strength for the <br />structure. <br />Lewis stated she believed the applicant did a good job exploring for the historical <br />elements. Lewis continued to state the structure is difficult to work with without a <br />foundation. Lewis also noted there was not much evidence of the historical <br />windows (openings). <br />Muckle asked if there was any original flooring remaining. <br />Lawrence stated that she wasn’t sure and she would ask her demo contractor. <br />Lawrence did state they are trying to reuse as many of the materials as possible <br />in the rebuild. <br />Lawrence noted that newspaper was found on the inside walls that dated back to <br />1893. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.