My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resource Conservation Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2010 01 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
RESOURCE CONSERVATION ADVISORY BOARD (RECYCLE)
>
2010 Resource Conservation Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Resource Conservation Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2010 01 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 10:10:58 AM
Creation date
1/11/2010 7:40:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
RCABPKT 2010 01 11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 10f3 <br /> <br />Subject: LRCAB Goals & Projects for 2009, for Discussion at <br />City Council Study Session, 28-April-2009 <br />From: Louisville Resource Conservation Advisory Board (LRCAB) <br />Date: 21-April-2009 <br /> <br />Members of LRCAB plan to work on the following <br />projects during the coming year: <br /> <br />FIRST: The most important topic for LRCAB <br />members at this particular time is still our <br />recommendation that the City of Louisville adopt <br />a "Green-Build" Residential and Commercial <br />Construction Program. We support the work <br />done by Planning-Department Director Paul <br />Wood and Chief Building Official Mike Jones <br />during the past year to begin implementation of <br />such a Green-Build Program. <br /> <br />At our meetings the past few months we've had <br />some local residents report on their <br />conversations with Paul Wood and Mike Jones, <br />which indicated their interest in proceeding with <br />both residential and commercial applications of <br />green-build criteria. And at our April 2009 <br />meeting we were informed by Mike Jones, that <br />our Building Department plans to adopt the <br />International Codes Council's 2009 Energy- <br />Conservation Code. We urge City Council <br />approval of that code's adoption when it is <br />formally presented to you. <br /> <br />As we've stated previously, any building code <br />establishes the minimum nation-wide standards <br />required at that particular time. And because <br />they are minimum standards, there are plenty of <br />options for improvements in those standards, <br />through improved construction-site practices, <br />new technological improvements, and use of <br />better building materials. Building codes do not <br />necessarily change to keep up with advances in <br />building materials and processes. And routinely, <br />if improved practices and materials are not <br />required by "code", they are not used by builders. <br />Nor can it be assumed that a city will always <br />adopt the most recent code versions established <br />by the ICC. There may not seem to be sufficient <br />changes, either in numbers or in improvements, <br />to warrant the costs to adopt new codes as they <br />become published. <br /> <br />In such circumstances having our own local <br />Green-Build Program will allow us to straddle <br />such gaps in national standards and implement <br />such improvements as we ourselves choose, for <br />our local and regional conditions and needs. Our <br />own locally developed and administered program <br />will give our city building officials much greater <br />flexibility to meet local needs than any hoped-for <br />future national program, that by necessity may <br />have to be set to a lower common standard to <br />meet diverse national conditions and try to be a <br />"one size fits all" solution. <br /> <br />Right now, new residential and commercial <br />construction projects are down from levels pro- <br />jected late last year, and so establishing and <br />implementing a Green-Build Program will have <br />minimal impact on new-permit applicants and <br />give them time to become familiar with what <br />standards we may establish. And the trend to <br />demolish old houses and replace them with new <br />larger houses will continue here. More residents <br />who have difficulties selling their homes in a <br />weakened market will be remodeling their <br />homes, to improve them either for their own <br />continued use or to increase their sell-ability in <br />the market. So it is definitely worthwhile now to <br />establish green-build criteria applicable to such <br />remodel projects, to optimize their quality and <br />habitability, and reduce their adverse environ- <br />mental impacts. <br /> <br />And we reiterate our recommendation from last <br />year that City Council appropriate such funds as <br />may be necessary to implement a Green-Build <br />Program, based on reporting prepared by City <br />Staff to establish the need for such funds, and as <br />compared to similar costs incurred by our neigh- <br />boring Cities and County to administer their own <br />programs. <br /> <br />One former member of LRCAB, Ms Mona <br />Newton, currently works for Governor Ritter's <br />Energy Office (GEO). She has come to a couple <br />of our recent public meetings and has informed <br /> <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.