City Council Minutes 1998 03 03 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Lawrence Lavin, lawyer in land use work, stated that with the language in condition No. 1, they were being asked to file a blank check. He wanted an agreement on the language. Davidson asked what the purpose of the median cut was. Tom Phare, Public Works Director, explained that it would be for emergency vehicle access, both in and out of the facility. Davidson pointed out all of the other properties along McCaslin that did not have a median cut. Davidson called for the applicant's summary. Thomasch stated that on condition No. 2, brick columns, they would be incorporating columns that are appropriate to the design of the fence; No. 3, they had no problem with; No. 4, would be worked out with staff; No. 5, they would commit to a lighting standard for that area; No. 6, they still preferred to use vinyl siding on the building. Mayer stated that on condition No. 1, approval would be conditional upon this language being worked out; therefore, there will be no approval until there is an agreement between the City and the applicant on this issue. Mayer moved that Council approve Resolution No. 9, Series 1998, with the following conditions: 1.) 2.) 3.) 4.) 5.) 6.) 7.) 8.) That the applicant agrees to formalize the commitment to participate in the possible future funding of the McCaslin Interchange improvements that will be worked out in the Subdivision Agreement between staff and the applicant and that a note to the Subdivision Agreement will appear on the Plat with the language that is currently written, modified to include the note on the Plat. On the Fence, that the applicant and staff work out a reasonable arrangement for the brick columns that are visible from McCaslin. As is. As is. Be changed that the applicant and staff will work out lighting through a mutually agreed lighting standard. Remove condition No. 6. To make it clear that the Special Review Use only applies to this property and any other use would require a new PUD process and that there is no vested property right to any other use of the property. Remove the median cut. Levihn seconded.