My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1998 04 21
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1998 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1998 04 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:43 PM
Creation date
3/23/2004 9:07:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/21/1998
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1998 04 21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Lathrop agreed with Howard and Mayer on the parking issue. He liked the look of the building, but <br />took exception to the height and appearance from the north/south elevations. He feels the building <br />is too massive. <br /> <br />Levihn agreed with the previous Council comments. He feels buildings are being put ahead of the <br />plan for downtown. He wanted the plan developed first. <br /> <br />Sisk reported that he and Keany recently hosted a Ward I meeting and a number of unfavorable <br />comments were made regarding the three-story building downtown. Parking issues were also <br />discussed. <br /> <br />Keany agreed with Council's comments. He feels a three-story building would look out of place and <br />a two-story would make a better fit for this area. <br /> <br />Davidson commended Ruskus for her commitment to downtown Louisville and Hartronft for his <br />building design. He feels that there are three issues: "parking, parking, and parking." He stated that, <br />historically, Louisville has provided some parking for retail customers only. <br /> <br />Sisk moved that Council move this on to the Planning Commission, seconded by Levihn. All in <br />favor. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION - FINAL PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR LOUISVILLE <br />FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT - STATION EXPANSION AT 895 W. VIA APPIA <br />BLVD. <br /> <br />Davidson called for staff introduction. <br /> <br />Paul Wood, Planning Director, explained that the Fire District proposes to build a 5,800 s.f., five-bay <br />garage addition to the existing structure and remodel the existing garage space into administrative, <br />meeting, training, and future dormitory space. Louisville Fire Station No. 2 is located on Via Appia, <br />across from the Recreation Center. A 100' wide by 95' long patterned concrete driveway is proposed <br />to access the new five-bay garage. The applicant proposes to increase the median cut from the <br />current 51' opening to an optimum 101' opening for ingress/egress of fire apparatuses. A minimum <br />71' median cut is required. Staff has expressed concern about the breadth of the median cut on Via <br />Appia and the possibility that the large glass doors might produce nuisance or dangerous glare. No <br />landscaping has been proposed for the driveway. <br /> <br />Davidson called for the Fire District's comments. <br /> <br />Greg McMenamim, McMenamim/Davis Architects, 1810 South Clarkson, Denver, Colorado, <br />pointed out that the glass doors are for passive solar and would be aesthetically appealing. He feels <br />the standing-seam metal roof would blend well with the Recreation Center across the street. He <br />explained that modifying the median cut on Via Appia was to allow maneuvering Fire Department <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.