Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 2, 2010 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br /> <br />City Attorney Light introduced Ordinance No. 1565, Series 2010. <br /> <br />Mayor Sisk requested a Staff presentation. <br /> <br />City Manager Fleming explained both ordinances are related. Ordinance No. <br />1565, Series 2010 authorizes a loan from the Water and Wastewater Utility Fund <br />to make up the deficit in the ~~009 budget. Ordinance No. 1566, Series 2010 <br />provides a loan from the Watler and Wastewater Utility Fund as a defeasance of <br />the Golf Course General Obligation Bonds, which provided funding for the <br />construction of the golf courSl3. The golf course has been paying off those bonds <br />over a period of ten years. Blecause of the tax laws regarding private activity and <br />the non-profit status, the proposed structure for the operating agreement with <br />Western Golf Properties, is a defeasance of the bonds. The City plans to hold an <br />open house on the contract before it is presented to City Council for their <br />consideration. He asked Parks and Recreation Director Stevens to provide <br />background information on the proposed contract. <br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Director Stevens explained the process began in July of <br />2009 with a letter he sent to VVestern Golf Properties expressing the City's <br />decision to not continue under the current agreement. The agreement paid <br />Western Golf Properties a management fee of $96,000 and the City funded the <br />Pro Shop, the merchandise, equipment and the operation of the golf course. If <br />the golf course was profitable, the City kept the profits, if there were no profits, <br />the City still paid a $96,000 management fee. A focus group made up of golfers <br />and non-golfers was formed and asked at an October 29, 2009 meeting whether <br />the agreement should be modified and if so, what terms should be included. <br />Another question asked was should the City continue with the current agreement <br />contract, or pursue a RFQ and RFP process. The focus group felt they should <br />entertain a good faith agreemE:mt with Western Golf Properties. He noted a <br />performance criterion was incorporated into the agreement. He stated he has <br />discussed this issue with other golf course professionals. <br /> <br />Finance Director Watson explained the loan process and defeasance of the golf <br />course general obligation bonds through a loan from the Water and Wastewater <br />Utility fund. Discussions began in November between the Finance Director, <br />Parks and Recreation Director and the City Attorney, which centered on the <br />City's Home Rule Charter and the tax consequences of the agreement. The <br />charter prohibits leasing the golf course due to the definition of open space and <br />there were also some bond IRS taxability issues. The City Attorney suggested a <br />licensing agreement in lieu of a leasing agreement. The discussions lasted <br />throughout the holidays and included bond counsel and the City's financial <br />adviser. A licensing agreement releases the City from some of the restrictions of <br />the Charter however there were still problems with the taxability of the bonds. <br />The City issued some certificates of participation in the 1990's on the golf course, <br />which were refunded in 2002 with General Obligation Bonds (tax exempt revenue <br />