My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 04 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2010 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 04 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2021 8:41:13 AM
Creation date
4/12/2010 1:25:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2010 04 08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
112
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 11, 2010 <br />Page 10 of 15 <br />Members of the Public: <br />Elmer Crider, 9355 Paradise Lane, Louisville stated his support of the project and <br />what a blessing it will be for the City. <br />Donna Auguste, 9350 Paradise Lane, Louisville read a letter into record stating <br />the ConocoPhillips project will have a profound impact on their lives. The <br />extension of Campus Drive will also impact their property. She stated the rural <br />character will be lost. <br />Larry Helms, 9255 Paradise Lane, stated his support for the project. <br />Ed Byrne, 250 Arapahoe Ave., Boulder, representing the Thompson Family <br />(9250 Paradise Lane), summarized the negative impact the development will <br />have on the Thompson property. He distributed a set of pictures to illustrate his <br />discussion. <br />Erich Hardy, 9555 Paradise Lane, stated his support for the project. He thanked <br />ConocoPhillips for the professionalism they demonstrated with thig sidents on <br />Paradise Lane. <br />Peter Stewart, 1132 Jefferson, Louisville express <br />4 and the building heights should be based on de <br />the community. He stated a 95' tall building does <br />David Waldman, 1871 Continental View Dr. <br />applicant to provide the required land dedic <br />of building heights st- 35' limitation i <br />stated his support <br />limitation would <br />hot <br />hcern with Resolution No. <br />n and provide a benefit to <br />benefit the community. <br />uisville discussed the need for the <br />continued with a discussion <br />riate for the site. He <br />ght instead of the sprawl that the 35' height <br />Audrey DeBarros, ' W. t., Lou ville, representing the US 36 <br />Commutin• • ution, .e• dal and TDM approach, the bike <br />conne _ - gr• desire to co inue working with ConocoPhillips on <br />TD <br />Mar emba, 1260 Hays Dr., Louisville stated the 95' is appropriate. He also <br />stated ompany locating to Louisville will provide benefit to downtown <br />Louisville. <br />Russell Moor- , 0 13 ahoe Circle, Louisville stated he has had a working <br />relationship with Can oPhillips through CU. He stated he has been impressed <br />with the plans and the pre -planning ConocoPhillips has been doing. <br />Steve Anderson, 225 South Boulder Road, Louisville stated his excitement for <br />ConocoPhillips to be a part of Colorado, especially Louisville. He expressed <br />concerns with the extension of Campus Drives but also believes the extension is <br />needed. <br />John Leary, 1116 Lafarge, Louisville stated his concerns with the requested <br />waivers and the need for more detail regarding those waivers. His concerns <br />center on specific sections of the Louisville Municipal Code. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.