Laserfiche WebLink
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 16, 2010 <br />Page 7 of 13 <br />the Council has sole discretion on the agreement after receiving recommendation from <br />the Planning Commission. <br />Councilor Yarnell did not agree with the assessment of a vested rights agreement <br />providing fluidity to a development. She felt the amount of detail required in the initial <br />stages would take away the fluidity of the development. She did not support changing <br />the code for one developer. She voiced her concern over having a vested rights tool, <br />which may not be used often enough to have a full grasp of what it can do. She favored <br />looking at a less drastic alternative. <br />Councilor Clabots shared some of the Councilor Yarnell’s concern and stated he could <br />not support the ordinance. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Marsella stated although she did not favor passing the ordinance based <br />on a single request, she supported a detailed vested agreement reviewed by the <br />Planning Commission to protect the City.She supported the passage of the ordinance. <br />Mayor Sisk would have preferred the ordinance came before ConocoPhillips <br />development, but supported the ordinance and the Planning Commission review. <br />Councilor Muckle proposed Ordinance No. 1567 be postponed until the ConocoPhillips <br />Preliminary Plan is reviewed by Council. <br />Mayor Sisk requested public comment and hearing none, closed the public hearing. <br />MOTION: Councilor Dalton moved to approve Ordinance No. 1567, Series 2010 on final <br />reading as amended to allow for Planning Commission review and recommendation, <br />seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Marsella. Roll call vote was taken. The motion carried by <br />a vote of 4-3. Councilors Yarnell, Muckle and Clabots voted no. <br />PUBLIC HEARING – CONOCOPHILLIPS CAMPUS ANNEXATION & INITIAL <br />ZONING, REZONING, PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT & PRELIMINARY PUD <br />DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUESTS <br />Annexation Documents: <br />1. RESOLUTION No. 9, SERIES 2010 – A RESOLUTION CONCERNING A <br />PETITION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF <br />LOUISVILLE, COLORADO KNOWN AS THE CONOCOPHILLIPS ANNEXATION TO <br />THE CITY OF LOUISVILLE, AND FIND THE AREA PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED <br />ELIGIBLE FOR ANNEXATION <br />2. RESOLUTION No 10, SERIES 2010 – A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN <br />ANNEXATION AGREEMENT FOR THE CONOCOPHILLIPS ANNEXATION <br />îì <br /> <br />