Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2010 04 14

Home Browse Search

L. Provide a phasing plan for improvements on the public land dedications. All trail improvements are preferred in phase 1. If trail improvements are offered in lieu of acreage, they must be included in phase 1. If all trail improvements are not included in Phase 1, temporary trails, signage, fencing, dedicated construction crossings and an indemnification and hold harmless agreement between COP and the City of Louisville is recommended. OSAB recommends approval of Resolution No. 03, Series 2010, a resolution recommending approval of the Conoco Phillips Campus PCZD-C zoning request and General Development Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. Include a note on the GDP that states "Public land dedication of 12% to comply with section 16.16.060B of the LMC." 2. If a waiver of requirements is considered, additional valuable land dedication or usable functional open space in excess of 12 % is required per section 17.28.110 of the Louisville Municipal Code. 3. The "Site Information" table should be amended to remove "Gross Property Area" and "Area within City and County of Broomfield." 4. OSAB requests trail engineering, construction and maintenance be included in the dedication and may consider accepting such in lieu of acreage. 5. OSAB recommends that dedicated lands be restored, established and maintained to native prairie at standards consistent with the reclamation standards of the City of Louisville as determined by City staff. OSAB recommends approval of Resolution No. 04, Series 2010, a resolution recommending approval of a Preliminary Subdivision Plat and a Preliminary PUD Development Plan subject to the following conditions: The applicant will continue to work to resolve the fOllowing issues for final plat and PUD development plan submittal: a. Public Land Dedication b. Secure a North/South bikeway connection on the east side of the campus c. Finalize site plan and design review The Open Space Advisory Board is concerned about the quality of the Open Space and shares the following general observations: 1. Public Open Space with steep slopes and adjacent to Hwy. 36 does not provide a quality experience and is unsuitable for the public land dedication. 2. Dependent on final design, the proximity of public lands to the security fences is a concern that may need additional consideration. 3. Additional/other land should be explored for parks and open space dedication. 2