Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
The Preliminary PUD Concept Plan does contain a note requiring that a sidewalk be provided for <br />on one side of the internal street. As the 30'-wide drive providing access to the west parking lot will <br />eventually tie into a loop road as reflected on the General Development Plan, the Commission <br />recommended that a sidewalk be added to the north side of the drive at this time. The applicant has <br />requested that construction of that specific sidewalk connection be deferred until the construction <br />of the campus loop road is initiated. <br /> <br />The location of the building footprint for MOB II overlaps into both Lot 4 and Lot 2 of the Health <br />Park Subdivision Plat, Filing No. 5. While it does not appear that the building would be located over <br />any platted easements, the Commission recommends that the applicant submit a subdivision replat <br />prior to the issuance of a building permit for the MOB II. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission approved the PUD with eleven conditions. The revised PUD complies <br />with all but three. <br /> <br />Davidson called for the applicant's presentation. <br /> <br />Lynn Moore, Davis Partnership P.C., 1775 Sherman Street, Suite 3100, Denver, Colorado, explained <br />there is a need for this facility due to the tremendous growth in the community and increased demand <br />for health care services. They have expanded the parking lot and eliminated the parking structure <br />because it did not fit in with future development. The landscaping has been situated to provide <br />optimum screening. The architecture of MOB II is proposed to match the existing MOB as much as <br />possible. She displayed various building elevations for Council review. She reviewed the drainage <br />report for the property. <br /> <br />Davidson called for Council questions and comments. <br /> <br />Howard asked the applicant if they would agree to condition # 1. <br /> <br />Moore replied, yes. <br /> <br />Howard asked the applicant if they would agree to condition #2. <br /> <br />Moore replied they are willing to submit a final plat, but not prior to the issuance of a building <br />permit. She offered to tie it to the certificate of occupancy for the building. <br /> <br />Howard asked the applicant if they would agree to condition//3. <br /> <br />Moore replied they are requesting that the sidewalk be deferred, as it would not lead anywhere at this <br />point. She stated they are also requesting that up to 80 parking spaces be deferred until a need for <br />those spaces is demonstrated. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br /> <br />