My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1974 12 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1974 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1974 12 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:34 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 9:25:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
12/3/1974
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1974 12 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
;,-' `_ ....Y` L 7 . ' T.��wa �r .r . :. • '_t.`ls'q t ♦ F <br /> • <br /> .r <br /> COMMISSION ITEMS ODNT'D Mr. Wurl reviewed for the Planning <br /> STATE RICWWXX REPOT Commission the County submitted High- <br /> way Reports. He stated that the <br /> County had not included Items 2, 4, <br /> and 5, of the City Memo for State <br /> and County Highway Recommendations, <br /> in their rennrr rn rh• grAr. Aw <br /> suggested that a letter be written <br /> to the County stating that if in <br /> fact, they are not going to pass <br /> our requests to the State then the <br /> City would deal directly with the <br /> State concerning the State Highway <br /> Recommendations. The Commission <br /> agreed that the City's feelings, in <br /> this matter, should be known by <br /> the County. Howard Berry moved <br /> that the City write one letter to <br /> the County Commissioners protest- <br /> ing the handling of our State High- <br /> way Recommendations and a second <br /> letter to the State Highway Depart- <br /> ment, informing them of our dis- <br /> pleasure with the-Boulder County <br /> Recothmendatton. The motion was <br /> seconded by Vivian Dbieux, all mem- <br /> bers were in favor, motion carried. <br /> COUNTY v, SS R PLAN Mr. Wurl explained that the County <br /> has asked the Louisville Planning <br /> Commission and the City Council to <br /> review the County Master Plan, and <br /> that if there were any suggested <br /> changes, the County be informed be- <br /> fore December 20, 1974. Mr. Wurl <br /> augessted the Planning Commission <br /> review it and f they had any sug- <br /> gestions, to advise him, as there <br /> would not be enough time to submit <br /> a letter to the County. The Com- <br /> mission members discussed to some <br /> extent, the goals of the County <br /> Master Plan. Mr. Wurl advised them <br /> that Mr. Teppe, Boulder County Plan- <br /> ning Director, would be at the next <br /> regular Planning Commission Meeting <br /> and would answer any questions that <br /> the members might have. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.