Laserfiche WebLink
_ <br /> • �.�� <br /> September 6, 197 <br /> 110 Page 2 • Minutes <br /> , <br /> CITT ATTORNEY won <br /> Z*80 .DTZON #7 Attorney This stated that the City has <br /> FOOTHILLS WATER PROJECT been requested to have copacil consider <br /> adopting a resolution tlhereby they world; <br /> show their support for the co structios <br /> of a 500 million gallon foothills water t <br /> treatment plant complex southwest of <br /> Denver. Re then read Resolution #7, <br /> Series 1977. <br /> Inc. hurl added that the basis for the <br /> request is to get as many actions of <br /> governing bodies backing them, as they <br /> have pubic hearings coming up before <br /> the Bureau of Land Management. <br /> Councilman Dhieux commented that the <br /> Resolution was very well written. <br /> After comments, Councilman Dhieux moved <br /> that Resolution #7, be adopted. Se- <br /> conded by Councilman DiCarlo. Roll <br /> call. Dhieuz yes, DiCarlo yes, Caranci <br /> yes, DelPizzo yes, DiLcrenzo yes. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> ORDINANCE #567 Attorney Joss noted that all members of <br /> CAT ORDINANCE Council had before them a copy of the <br /> FIRST READING Ordinance for their review and files; <br /> he then read it on first reading by <br /> title only, commenting on portions of <br /> the ordinance for the benefit of the <br /> persons in attendance. <br /> .Hrs. Lybarger, Mts. Parkins and Mts. <br /> Wisek stated that they were not in favor <br /> of an ordinance and that it will be hard <br /> for cat owners to keep within the <br /> ordinance. <br /> After comments Councilman Caranci moved <br /> that Ord. #567 be ordered published and <br /> a public hearing set for October 4, 1977. <br /> Seconded by Councilman DiCarlo. Motion <br /> carried. <br /> ORDINANCE #568 Attorney Joss read the ordinance on <br /> ADOPTION MUNICIPAL CODE second reading by title only, stating <br /> that all proper notices were ublished <br /> Mayor Waschak opened the public hearing. <br /> There were no comments for or against. <br /> The public hearing was closed. <br /> Attorney Joss stated that within the <br /> Ordinance under section 2 and 4, the <br /> noting of Ordinance #562 should be <br /> deleted. as that ordinance was defeated. <br />