My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1979 04 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1979 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1979 04 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:40 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 10:44:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
4/3/1979
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1979 04 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
411 "parch 20, 197,I <br /> • <br /> ORDINANCE NO. 637 6 638 <br /> • <br /> PUBLIC NEARING - <br /> OPPOSED .Peter Jima* •1125 lain St. :x ; T <br /> • <br /> 1. New resident who would like to think • '''11 ', <br /> the City for such a• fine community. <br /> Rick Luce 187 Harper St. <br /> 1. Did not like the emergency clause. - <br /> Lynn Colbertson 788 W. Cleveland Circ. Laf. <br /> 1. Felt the size was too large. <br /> 2.Recoamended tabling of the project until <br /> further and real genuine research. <br /> STAFF REMARKS Community Development Director Dennis <br /> Drumm summarized and reviewed what <br /> has happend with this roposed annexation <br /> since they petitioned for annexation to the <br /> City of Louisville. <br /> He pointed out that the City had supplied <br /> the necessary information to the State Land <br /> Use Commission under their annexation <br /> • standards and criteria, by submitting <br /> of the annexation impact statement. He <br /> felt that the impact statement was a very <br /> extensive and comprehensive analysis of <br /> . any proposed annexation that has been <br /> submitted to any City. <br /> After the information was submitted and <br /> revised, a public hearing was hold by the <br /> Planning Commission on the proposed annex- <br /> ation and zoning, at which the Planning <br /> Commission adopted Resolution #4, recommending <br /> that the annexation and zoning be approved <br /> by the City Council with six conditions. <br /> He stated that the conditions halts been <br /> addressed and memos sent to Council for <br /> their review. <br /> The matter was brought before the County <br /> and they suggested that the City proceed <br /> with a comprehensive plan amendment to be <br /> submitted to the County Planning Dept. <br /> The comp plan amendment was presented to <br /> the Louisville Planning Commission and <br /> approved which basically designates the <br /> vicinity of the proposed shopping center <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.