My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1979 04 03
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1979 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1979 04 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:40 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 10:44:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
4/3/1979
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1979 04 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> • Mirch 20, 1979 <br /> A <br /> ORDINANCE N0. 637 & 636 <br /> PUBLIC HEARING - <br /> � <br /> STAFF REMARKS as a regional shopping center and ancillist <br /> y,' <br /> commercial site and amends one of the , 4% <br /> sections in the comp plan to provide for ''_, <br /> this use and further amend other sections iftW <br /> to provide for. -..• <br /> The proposed amendment was submitted to <br /> the boulder County Planning Commission <br /> and the proposed amendment was defeated. <br /> Following the County meeting a hearing <br /> was held before the Boulder County Com- <br /> missioners at which time the CommIssionera <br /> decided to take no legal action against <br /> what the City of Louisville could do. <br /> The State Land Use Commission decided not <br /> only to take no action, but actually <br /> stated that Louisville is in compliance <br /> with all the procedures and criteria that <br /> the City established several years ago <br /> in response to their request and demand. <br /> Based on all the information Mr. Drumm <br /> recommended to Council that the annexation <br /> and zoning be approved. <br /> Mr. Wurl, pointed out that no consideration <br /> was given to an emergency clause in the <br /> ordinance until the City of Boulder threatened <br /> the City of Louisville with acquisition of <br /> the property and or condemnation. <br /> He stated that it is his understanding that <br /> in the Colorado . Daily, Councilman Danish <br /> renewed his request of the Boulder City <br /> Council to consider possible condemnation <br /> of the land, on this day, so that threat <br /> never did go away. <br /> Mr. Wurl reviewed the i qf the emergency <br /> clause. <br /> Item 1. Deals wit} cs and storage <br /> facilities in quan l=ng th.: <br /> amount the City we sin with <br /> the annexation. <br /> Staff felt that it rortant <br /> to the City that t jar that <br /> added water. It it er, it's <br /> early Howard water. _ s it important <br /> for the City, as a pi. ..he package. <br /> Item 2. Open space deoiestion, urban shaping <br /> and buffering in amounts of land that far <br /> exceed the City's recommended or required <br /> amount. The City requires 12% of the rand <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.