My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1979 04 17
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1979 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1979 04 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:40 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 10:45:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
4/17/1979
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1979 04 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
.Mr. Leon A. hurl 111 410 <br /> April 13, 1979 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Boulder have not been nearly as aggressive as has Louisville in <br /> water right acquisition. We have thus been able to tie up several <br /> hundred sere foot of water rights recently at what still moat be <br /> considered lower than market prices. However, this situation is <br /> certain to change and we will soon see the day when we are prying <br /> $2,000.00 per acre foot for water rights. <br /> Our strategy therefore must be to tie up as many of the quality <br /> water rights as we can while attempting to spread the payments out <br /> over a reasonable period of time. The recent contract with Marcus <br /> F. Church concerning the Howard Ditch is an excellent example. We <br /> paid *27,500.00 for the share but our payment. are wade in five <br /> equal installments. By the time we fully pay for the share it will <br /> probably be worth $75,000.00. <br /> It is not always possible to negotiate installment terms. <br /> With the value of water rights escalating so rapidly there is little <br /> incentive to sell. Most of the people we contract with are either <br /> retiring or need cash for another investment. This is the case with <br /> the contract with Mr. Norm Fleet which is on the agenda. <br /> This contract concerns the purchase of 15.4 shares of Marshall <br /> Lake water and 95 shares of stock in the Leyner Cottonwood Ditch. <br /> The total selling price would be $137,000.00. The City has not <br /> previously purchased any stock in the Leyner Cottonwood Ditch <br /> Company, but it is a water right we can use The ditch diverts from <br /> south Boulder Creek and we would propose to transfer it upstream <br /> to the pipeline and to the Community Ditch for use on both the direct <br /> flow and storage basis. The average yield per share is 0.8 acre feet. <br /> While the ditch is junior in priority to many of the water rights we <br /> already own, it is senior to the Marshallville Ditch, South Boulder <br /> Canyon Ditch, Davidson Ditch and Goodhue Ditch on South Boulder Creek. <br /> The disadvantage of this agreement is that the sellers are <br /> insisting upon a cash sale and we have not been able to negotiate any <br /> installment terms. However, you have indicated to me that the money <br /> is available. The advantage of this agreement is that it gives us <br /> an opportunity to buy a very large quality of water in a single <br /> transaction. The average yield of the Marshall shares and the Leyner <br /> Cottonwood shares together would be approximatley 138 acre feet per <br /> year. <br /> This is somewhat of a complicated situation and there is a <br /> possibility that we will not actually close on this contract. It has <br /> been represented to no that a partnership is involved in the ownership <br /> of these water rights and that the partnership agreement contains <br /> a first right of refusal which allows each of the individual partners <br /> an opportunity to purchase partnership property before it is sold <br /> to any third party. In effect, our contract offer represents a bona <br /> fide offer to the owners which triggers the right of first refusal. <br /> Due to this requirement, the conti.ct probably cannot be closed before <br /> late May or early June. <br /> .�_ —.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.