My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1979 08 11
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1979 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1979 08 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:30:40 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 10:49:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
8/11/1979
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1979 08 11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Amightkr W75, <br /> 410 <br /> COUNCIL COMMENTS & COMMITTEE <br /> REPORTS <br /> MESA POINT - MRS. KNOTT Councilmen Berm, DiCarlo and DelPiaso <br /> stated that they received a telephone <br /> call from Mrs. Knott in Mesa Point. <br /> She stated that after they purchased their <br /> hoarse, a building was started next door <br /> which they felt is in violation of sot <br /> back regulations. She stated that they <br /> called the City Inspector who looks <br /> at the location and found it not in <br /> violation. Mrs. Knott said the builder <br /> had applied to the Board of Adjustment <br /> and it was denied and now they are re- <br /> questing the variance again. Construc- <br /> tion is still going on and Mt. & Mrs. <br /> Knott have hired an attorney and filed <br /> for an injunction. <br /> Mr. Wurl stated that the same request <br /> for a variance is heard only once by <br /> the BOA and if denied. it then goes to <br /> court. <br /> Mr. Drumm stated that he was not aware <br /> of the variance going before the BOA <br /> previously. He also stated that a letter <br /> was sent to the contractor notifying <br /> him that he was in violation and any • <br /> further construction on the house was <br /> at his own risk. <br /> Mr. Drumm noted that the builder does <br /> have a right to request a hearing for <br /> a variance and come before the Board. <br /> Mr. Drumm also stated that the plans <br /> were apprvoed by the City with the in- <br /> correct set backs and the Board of <br /> Adjustment will determine whether the <br /> house will need to be relocated or if <br /> they will allow the encroachment. <br /> Councilman Berry stated that he did not <br /> feel the BOA should be used to correct <br /> a City mistake. <br /> Mr. Drumm stated that boing before the <br /> BOA is the legal procedure to remedy <br /> a problem one way or the other and it <br /> is the option of the party in violation <br /> to request the hearing. <br /> After discussion Council decided to <br /> table the mattes until after the BOA <br /> hearing on July 19, 1979. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.