Laserfiche WebLink
410 411 <br /> 11/17/81 Page -3- <br /> Attorney Rautenstraus advised that a meet- <br /> ing would be held with Chief Leeman and <br /> Engineer Blanchard to discuss his question. <br /> Councilman Meier then referred to page 4 <br /> 10.20.050 "No person shall park a vehicle <br /> in a public right-of-way in such a manner <br /> that any part of the vehicle which exceeds 6' <br /> in height shall be within 30' upon the <br /> approach of any speed limit sign located <br /> at the side of a roadway.' His suggestion <br /> was this curbing should be painted also. <br /> Attorney Rautenstraus would advise on this <br /> also. <br /> Question called for on the motion. All <br /> in favor. Motion carried 4-0. <br /> ORDINANCE #749 - ALCOHOLIC Attorney Rautenstraus read the ordinance <br /> BEVERAGE PERMIT FOR PARKS by title only, each member of council had <br /> 1ST READING a copy before him; and the request was for <br /> publication on 1st reading. <br /> PUBLICATION AUTHORIZED Councilman Meier moved that ordinance #749 <br /> Alcoholic Beverage Permit for Parks be <br /> put out for publication. Seconded by <br /> Councilman Fauson. <br /> Councilman Cummings Asked if the ordinance implied that a permit <br /> would be given for people to drink. in the <br /> parks? <br /> Director Hioco stated - no, this is for <br /> large groups of 15+ people who apply for <br /> a park permit. On the park permit a question <br /> asks if there will be any alcoholic beverages <br /> are being served; this is when the alcoholic <br /> beverage permit would have to be obtained. <br /> Attorney Rautenstraus stated this is just <br /> for an exclusive use permit at one of the <br /> park facilities . not just for a picnic, but <br /> to lease out the entire facility. <br /> Councilman Cummings remarked there was no <br /> mention of numbers in the ordinance and <br /> suggested these perhaps should be included. <br /> It was his opinion most of the situations <br /> were a matter of law enforcement and the <br /> nominal fee of $50.00 would not cover the <br /> damage created by large groups of 100+ people. <br /> Even if the fee were $100 for outside people <br /> it was his opinion it would not compensate <br /> for damage. <br />