My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 05 04
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1982 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 05 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:50 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 11:58:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
5/4/1982
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1982 05 04
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• • <br /> 411 410 <br /> 4/20/82 Page -10- <br /> with the date the light industrial zoning <br /> was designated by the County, and a copy <br /> of the referral comments made to the <br /> County regarding the Trousil property. <br /> Councilman Leary Concurred that a letter should be written <br /> to the County, but it was his opinion the <br /> overall intent of the letter should be to • <br /> see if there is any possible way of resolving <br /> this issue, and if there should be others <br /> that may create the same problem. in the <br /> future; not just to reprimand thee. <br /> Councilman Ferrera Wanted to confirm - if council denied the <br /> request, would Trousil still be allowed to <br /> build? <br /> Administrator Wurl Advised it was his opinion that if Mr. <br /> Trousil was abiding by all the laws of the <br /> County; he has a well permit; permission <br /> for a ceptic tank, the building permit is <br /> all he needs. <br /> Councilman Ferrera Inquired would it be advantagious to the <br /> City that if Mr. Trousil does build,to grant <br /> the utility request, would we have some <br /> control over the subdivision. He felt <br /> the area had always been an open space <br /> priority of the City as it is a main entrance. <br /> He also felt as the designation stands, the <br /> • applicant could do whatever he wished to do. <br /> Administrator Wurl Commented in his opinion, in the best interests <br /> of the City, as difficult as it is to do, <br /> subject the granting of utilities to his <br /> annexation of the property to the City. <br /> Then he would be subject to the City's re- <br /> quirements. <br /> Motion to Table the Trousil. Councilman Ferrera moved, Councilman Cummings <br /> Request moved to table the Trousil request until <br /> next City Council meeting of May 4, 1982. <br /> Question called for. All in favor. Motion <br /> carried unanimously. <br /> STEWART REQUEST - ANNEXATION Each councilmember had a copy of the request. <br /> The applicant was not present. <br /> In answer to Councilman Leary's request, <br /> Director Rupp advised present zoning was <br /> Agricultural - Residential. Commercial <br /> zoning requests would have to be considered <br /> by Council individually. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.