City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 05 04

Home Browse Search

4 • 4/20/82 Page -9- is trying to form a policy, but at the same Louisville is becoming the arena to test it. I would think if anybody from Boulder County is present to get their information together. He was certain the applicant has had feed- back if they were zoned industrial, that there is going to be some kind of contention. He did not appreciate the fact as a Council- member, trying to develop a policy, of an applicant coming in to state they have Boulder County light industrial zoning, but Louisville has designated the area open space - now what do we do? This extremely irritated him. Administrator Wurl Advised it was his opinion that the property had been zoned light industrial for a number of years. A portion of what the staff was relying on, when they applied to subdivide the property, was the County's publicized position that they were opposed to approving development outside the City limits, in either our planning area or the City's urban services area. Also, their stated policy that they were going to direct the growth and development to inside the City limits and inside the Comp Plan. Councilman Leary Inquired if any building permits had been approved by Boulder County as yet; is there still the opportunity that the City could protest? Rupp advised it was his understanding when the County approved the subdivision, it would be difficult to deny approval for a building permit. Mayor Meier Commented regardless of the outcome of the request, he personally felt a letter should be written to-Boulder County stating that the City's zoning and their zoning design ationstmld agree, and the City's referral reply tending to be ignored, and this does not create the best working rel*tionehip between the tnu, especially since Louisville has endeavored to uphold the Boulder Valley Comp Plan, while the City's Comp Plan is not receiving the same treatment. He requested Attorney ?tauten- straws and Director Rupp provide Council