City Council Agenda and Packet 1983 03 15

Home Browse Search

• } 410 410 3/1/83 Page -4- City Office. Shallock is to report back on their reply. To date they have not received this and were asking since they are under bond to the City to complete the road improvements by June 15, 1983, could an extension of time be granted Neodata. Ben LaTorre, Facilities Mr. LaTorre reiterated what Director Rupp Manager - Neodata had stated regarding an extension of time on the road improvements or let them pro- ceed with the originally proposed plan. Will be running out of time on dates pro- vided by the Contractor. Advised there was an indication from the LDS Church that they were not interested in the shared access concept . Councilman Cummings Referred to section 8. 5 of the agreement and commented it was his feeling that the Neodata people didn' t need an extension of time to begin construction; felt that they had met their commitment and should be able to proceed. LaTorre stated this is essentially the commitment from the entire council that they need. Councilwoman Morris Inquired what kind of mitigations had Public Service stated that seems to be a problem with the LDS Church. Mr. LaTorre stated he did not feel there should be a problem. Public Service had provided the LDS Church with a letter re garding the sequence of events that had to take place; but none were difficult, time consuming, or costly to his recollection. In answer to Councilwoman Morris' question as to Public Service restrictions. LaTorre advised there were some deed changes re- garding their easement . Morris felt that every effort be made to accomplish the shared access; perhaps the City could deal with them more agressively. Commented that the construction of the LDS Church is progressing more expedient than the Neodata project ; was willing to grant an extension to Neodata on the road improve- ments but did not wish to abandon the shared access concept.