City Council Agenda and Packet 1983 03 15

Home Browse Search

4 • 3/1/83 Page -5- Councilman Cussen. Stated that he had contacted some of the local representatives of the LDS Church and they seemed to be very willing to discuss the agreement. He was not certain that they had the authority to make those decisions . Cussen had also visited with Don Shallock; felt council needed to con- firm if Shallock represented the Church locally as well as the Salt Lake City office. Shallock felt that Public Service had not made a long term commitment in terms of the access . Cussen stressed Salt Lake officials of the Church, Public Service Co . and council have a discussion per- tinent to the agreement and resolve the Church authority problem, as well as the shared access relative to the Public Ser- vice easement. Requested staff to contact Salt Lake to definitely determine who has the authority to make decisions. Mr. LaTorra commented that he did not re- call anything in the Public Service letter re- garding a short term lease; felt that they would agree to cooperate with the Church and Neodata as long as it did not interfere with their utility lines or poles. he Councilman Leary Commented/didn' t want council to lose focus of why the shared access requirement was placed in the agreement. Stated there would be additional problems in the future if there is no control on shared access. Felt that if a month' s delay on the Neodata project would be inconsequential to the proper function of South Boulder Road over the next 20 years. Felt that Neodata was doing their part but did not solve the problem of access control . Suggested that council contact Neodata within 2 or three weeks and if the problem is not solved by April 1st , an extension be given of 30-60 days to proceed. Councilman Ferrera Commented he did not feel Neodata should be penalized by delaying their project . Was his opinion that the LDS Church should be present either before the Planning Com- mission or City Council and enforce their subdivision agreement.