My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1983 08 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1983 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1983 08 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2021 12:40:39 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 1:04:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
8/16/1983
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1983 08 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
110 410 <br /> 8/2/83 Page -5- <br /> Drainage Problem grade on their present homes; they are con- <br /> cerned with the drainage and changes that <br /> were made in plans to alter the set-backs. <br /> Mrs. Stout had telephoned the City Engineer <br /> and he was to return her call verifying why <br /> the structures are being built that high. <br /> She had also spoken with Craig Krueger of <br /> Mc Stain Enterprises and he said that the <br /> City required him to have that fill grade. <br /> It brings the front doors of their struc- <br /> tures level with their 6' fences, which is <br /> almost 5 ' above the ground and they are only <br /> 30' away. The question was - why are not <br /> their structures the same grade level? <br /> Director Rupp Stated that he had spoken with Mrs. Stout <br /> earlier only about the set-back manner, but <br /> not the drainage. He had the Chief Building <br /> Inspector go to the area and confirm that <br /> the set-backs were not in violation of the <br /> plan approved by the City. The Building <br /> Inspector and Acting City Engineer were meeting <br /> on the drainage problem the next day. <br /> Set-Backs Mrs. Stout stated that they had one set of <br /> plans that show one thing and supposedly the <br /> City has another set of plans showing something <br /> else. Stated that when the Chief Building <br /> Inspector came out today he stated that the <br /> structures were within the set-back agreement, <br /> but they weren' t in the plans that they were <br /> shown. <br /> Director of Community Development Rupp advised <br /> Gnat the plans tilt ill y iias pig 4,■vov w...,� <br /> were approved by Council. They discussed the <br /> 40' setback on the east property lines and on <br /> the west property lines it is 60' where it <br /> will be a half-street. Requested that Mrs. <br /> Stout bring in her set of plans tomorrow. <br /> Fence Mrs. Stout also stated that their had been <br /> problems with the construction crews and <br /> cement trucks driving through their subdivision. <br /> Last week there was a chain put up and over <br /> the weekend someone took it. Today a wood <br /> barrier was installed. Their court is a small <br /> street, on which there are 11 children under <br /> the age of 8, and with all the contruction <br /> trucks traveling it there have been some close <br /> calls with the children. The wooden barrier <br /> did help somewhat. It was their assumption <br /> that they would be a fence around the entire <br /> subdivision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.