City Council Agenda and Packet 1984 01 03

Home Browse Search

12/20/83 Page -13- allow for the interpretations of flexibilities of developers. He would recnmwe-+d fur the plan as it is presented. He had been shown from the Planning Commission meeting that the pitch of the roof is approp; ate and that what had been presented would not be in violation of what the present code allows in regard to height. Councilwoman Morris Commented that she understood that there was Density Transfer a density transfer involved, zoned R-M and we were looking at 22.8 units to the acre, inquired what the regulations were - how units are allowed per acre? Director Rupp advised that the R-M zoning could permit whatever the City wound permit using the density *ransfer concept. If there were no density transfer involved, the maximum permitted would be 12.4 units per acre. The maximum for the H-H zone is approx .- ma.tely 21 per acre. Councilwoman Morris expressed concern with the density. Was not certain that that transi- tion has been mitigated. Would also prefer the height remain at 35' . Diector Rupp remarked the single family houses in his view in looking at the render- ing of the height west of Centennial are looking at a heighth that is consisent with a single family dwelling - 35' . The density transfer issue in looking at the McStain project for example this was often reviewed in the planning aspects that's going into that particular project. In that case they were R-E and they are allowing townhouses that are 12 units per acre. Therefore, the concept of the density trans- fer is working respectively there in the same principle as being applied here. So it would be consistent with past planning practices. Councilman Cussen Commented he would like to speak to the land- scaping and fencing. He expressed concern with the straight line fencing did not favor this, i.e. the fermi_ at Modena. ror as far as you can see Is straight bleached out wooden fence, doesn't have any brick. How does this fit in with this particular project?